Joseph Auclair: Trump is more than an incoherent anti-inter ventionist , he is an incoherent Buchananis t in pretty much all his politics and agenda, both foreign and domestic. Which means that at...
Ron Chusid: I’ve primarily been using social media for politics instead of the blog over the last several months. I’m going to have to get some updates, both on the Trump horrors and...
KP: Hillary is either in quick sand and doesn' ;t know it or is voluntaril y wad ing into the deep end wearing weight belts. She ought to hide in Timbuktu and get off the circuit. ...
Ron Chusid: Yes, they would. However, this week (when the comment was posted as opposed to the original post) it is Republican s in the Trump administra tion who have brought up the 25th Amendment.
CharlieK: The Democrats want to remove our legally elected President because he will not dance to their tune.
David Freeman: Donald cHump' ;s Enquire rag didn' t help much either. More will come out every day. Open the safe.
Ron Chusid: It would have been better to use #DemExit. But Cal’ s error is far worse. It is utterly ludicrous to claim Russia changed the results of the general election while also denying...
Cal Lawrence: Jim Mooney: There is no "#Wal kaway movement.& quot; It's completely fake. Also, anyone who thinks the Democratic nomination was "rigg ed" is stupid beyond words....
Jim Mooney: In a way, Hillary created the #Walkaway movement.
KP: "We do not need to promote a further deteriorat ion in the relations between nuclear powers.&qu ot; Agree 100%.
Ron Chusid: You ignore the fact that the post also links to posts critical of both Trump̵ 7;s lying and his policy on children. Plus I have been criticizin g Trump̵ 7;s policies on separa...
Marc McKenzie: "This is like living in the Darkest Timeline. On the one hand we have Clinton who continues to spread her lies after losing the election, and D onald Trump  ;in the...
SocraticGadfly: And now, on power plants, we also once again have the GOP pretending to like the mythical free market — until it doesn' ;t.
Ron Chusid: We will probably never go back to the pre-Facebo ok days. When Facebook works (ie lets us post without censorship ) it provides far more exposure to posts than can be obtained these...
KP: I agree … I miss the pre-Facebo ok days. Hang in there.&nbs p;
Ron Chusid: Unfortunat ely you are a minority. A huge percentage of readers these days comes from Facebook links̵ 1;with this down since Facebook changed their algorithms . I sure miss the...
SocraticGadfly: I have you on my blogroll, so unless Google starts taking an ax to Blogger blogs, I'm OK.
KP: Has anyone else noticed that Haspel often makes the same "whin ey" face as Comey?! They look like they are about to burst into tears if you challenge them; pleading to be believed and...
KP: "The history of Democrats throughout the war on terror is to ensure that just enough members of their caucus join with the GOP majority … " Well said. She is a slam dunk as I...
Mitt Romney’s proposed tax plan would provide tremendous tax cuts for the wealthy, but to make up for the revenue loss 95 percent of tax payers would see a tax increase according to a study by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center. Those in the top 0.1% would receive a tax break of nearly a quarter of a million dollars. In doing these calculations, the Tax Policy Center even granted Romney the questionable assumption that giving these tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy would stimulate the economy and generate more tax revenue.
Barack Obama brought this up in campaigning in Ohio:
“If Gov. Romney wants to keep his word and pay for this plan, then he’d have to cut tax breaks that middle-class families depend on to pay for your home, the home mortgage deduction; to pay for your health care, the health care deduction; (or) to send your kids to college,” the president said.
“And here’s the thing: He’s not asking you to contribute more to pay down the deficit, he’s not asking you to pay more to invest in our children’s education, or rebuild our roads or put more folks back to work,” Obama said in Mansfield, Ohio. “He’s asking you to pay more so that people like him can get a big tax cut.”
Romney’s international travels gave Jon Stewart a lot of material (video above). Things weren’t as bad for Romney in Poland as they were in London and Israel. He did receive the endorsement of Lech Walesa, but Solidarity distanced themselves, criticizing Romney because he “supported attacks on trade unions and employees’ rights.” Romney was also greeted with chants for Obama and even ran into supporters of Ron Paul while in Poland.
Israeli Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Ehud Barak undermined the Republican argument against Obama on Israel in this interview with Wolf Blitzer:
BLITZER: You’ve studied U.S.-Israeli relations over many years. How would you describe the relationship today?
BARAK: I think that from my point of view as defense minister they are extremely good, extremely deep and profound. I can see long years, administrations of both sides of the political aisle deeply supporting the state of Israel, and I believe that reflects the profound feelings among the American people. But I should tell you honestly that this administration under President Obama is doing, in regard to our security, more than anything that I can remember in the past.
BLITZER: More than any other president? LBJ, Bill Clinton, or George W. Bush?
BARAK: Yeah, in terms of the support for our security, the cooperation of our intelligence, the sharing of thoughts in a very open way even when there are differences, which are not simple sometimes, I found their support for our defense very stable.
Steve Benen debunked another anti-Obama talking from the Romney campaign on Israel:
Beth Myers, a top Romney aide, also told reporters recently that it’s “pretty amazing” Obama hasn’t visited Israel.
The attack at least has the benefit of being partially accurate — Obama visited Israel as a candidate, but has not been back during his first term. If Republicans choose to find that outrageous, their complaints are grounded in fact.
The problem, however, is the selective nature of their disgust. George W. Bush didn’t visit Israel at any point during his first term, and neither did Bill Clinton. Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush didn’t travel to Israel during their respective terms in office at all.
Many journalists have questioned whether Romney’s gaffes will harm him in the campaign. Chris Cillizza downplayed the damage:
It’s hard to imagine that Romney did himself any favors in answering lingering questions about his foreign policy acumen during this trip.
On the other hand, there is an argument to be made that nothing — literally, nothing — other than the economy at home matters to undecided voters. And that goes double for foreign policy, which is a bottom-of-mind issue (is that a thing?) for most voters.
In a late May Washington Post-ABC News poll, 1 — yes, one — percent of people said that foreign policy was the most important issue of the 2012 campaign. One!
Of course this might be the case when voters think that either candidate is capable of handling foreign policy. This could change as voters see that Romney is as inept as George Bush.