More Attacks on Obama From the McCain/Clinton Party

One thing about monitoring the blogosphere intermittently while on vacation is that sometimes by the time I get on line to check the news many blogs have already commented. It looks like Obama has done what he is prone to do–speak the truth as opposed to watching every word to avoid any chance of saying something controversial or of substance as most politicians are prone to do. This means that those who practice politics as usual–namely the right wing and Clinton supporters (which is actually redundant if you consider world view as opposed to conventional labels) have responded by finding more ways to distort Obama’s words.

Here is what Obama said:

So, it depends on where you are, but I think it’s fair to say that the places where we are going to have to do the most work are the places where people feel most cynical about government. The people are mis-appre…I think they’re misunderstanding why the demographics in our, in this contest have broken out as they are. Because everybody just ascribes it to ‘white working-class don’t wanna work — don’t wanna vote for the black guy.’ That’s…there were intimations of that in an article in the Sunday New York Times today – kind of implies that it’s sort of a race thing.

Here’s how it is: in a lot of these communities in big industrial states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, people have been beaten down so long, and they feel so betrayed by government, and when they hear a pitch that is premised on not being cynical about government, then a part of them just doesn’t buy it. And when it’s delivered by — it’s true that when it’s delivered by a 46-year-old black man named Barack Obama (laugher), then that adds another layer of skepticism (laughter).

But — so the questions you’re most likely to get about me, ‘Well, what is this guy going to do for me? What’s the concrete thing?’ What they wanna hear is — so, we’ll give you talking points about what we’re proposing — close tax loopholes, roll back, you know, the tax cuts for the top 1 percent. Obama’s gonna give tax breaks to middle-class folks and we’re gonna provide health care for every American. So we’ll go down a series of talking points.

But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

Um, now these are in some communities, you know. I think what you’ll find is, is that people of every background — there are gonna be a mix of people, you can go in the toughest neighborhoods, you know working-class lunch-pail folks, you’ll find Obama enthusiasts. And you can go into places where you think I’d be very strong and people will just be skeptical. The important thing is that you show up and you’re doing what you’re doing.

There’s certainly room to distort Obama’s words and falsely portray this as elitist or as an attack on rural America, as many McCain and Clinton supporters are doing. Once again it is difficult to find any meaningful difference between the McCain and Clinton camps. Both camps are similar in finding it easier to rely on such distortions as opposed to actually discussing ideas. David Sirota finds a similar statement from John McCain and argues that McCain Said It, Before He Attacked It. Oliver Willis has a good response to attacks from the right:

It’s intriguing that Dems are never supposed to voice any criticism of rural America (which isn’t what Sen. Obama did) but Republicans are allowed to insult San Francisco, Massachusetts, the coasts, etc. It’s like there’s a double standard or something.

Obama’s campaign later released this response to the attacks from McCain:

Senator Obama has said many times in this campaign that Americans are understandably upset with their leaders in Washington for saying anything to win elections while failing to stand up to the special interests and fight for an economic agenda that will bring jobs and opportunity back to struggling communities. And if John McCain wants a debate about who’s out of touch with the American people, we can start by talking about the tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans that he once said offended his conscience but now wants to make permanent

Update: Response from Obama.

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Fark
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Diigo
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • SphereIt
  • email
  • Print

5 Comments

  1. 1
    Jay McDonough says:

    from swimming freestyle:

    “Barack Obama is a remarkably eloquent man and turning into a remarkably capable politician. But if the Senator believes it’s smart to insult voters from a state critical to your success, he’s hit one of the worst false notes yet in his campaign.

    Yeah, I know what his campaign said, and that may have been what he meant. But a sophisticated candidate doesn’t refer to voters in language that can be construed as derogatory or insulting. Obama asserted Pennsylvania voters are bitter and so simple and lacking in maturity and intelligence that they address their frustration by clinging to primitive and reactionary crutches rather than addressing their problems in constructive ways.

    It’s divisive. And not the way to attract the voters you need most.”

    http://swimmingfreestyle.typepad.com

  2. 2
    Neo says:

    When I posted about this yesterday, I had found the part ..

    anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

    .. as just breathe taking in regard to the fact that just the day before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had taken the Columbian Free Trade agreement out of contention for an up or down vote.

    But why would Nancy Pelosi be bitter ?

    But alas, here was the leading contender for the Democratic nomination for POTUS basically saying that this was a cynical act, probably a cynical political act which was not in the interest of the nation, but nonetheless standard Democratic fare of the day.

    Does Obama believe that Pelosi and the House are that cynical or bitter ?

    I will watch and wait for an answer.

  3. 3
    natthedem says:

    How’s this for an answer: http://is.gd/5BW

  4. 4
    janet says:

    natthedem,

    Isn’t it great??!! I have watched it three times. This is what we want to hear. Give ‘em hell Barack!

  5. 5
    Ron Chusid says:

    Jay,

    Do you really want a “sophisticated candidate” who will make sanitized statements which do not risk offending anyone but which don’t really say anything? We already have standard “sophisticated” candidates like Hillary Clinton and John McCain–both of whom are striving to give us a another term of Bush-style politics.

3 Trackbacks

Leave a comment