Comments on: Sarah Palin Is Wrong About Caroline Kennedy, You Know

By: nomoreGOP

nomoreGOP — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:11:44 +0000

“What I love more than Sarah Palin gaffes are her defenders.”

I couldn’t agree more! LOL!!

I mean how “socially challenged” does one have to be to actually believe anything that Anti-Christ Palin spews. Then on top of that, have the audacity to not only defend her, but pull sexism and racism cards when left with no other way to defend her views…

By: Even Some Conservatives Realize Sarah Palin Lacks A Well-Informed Worldview - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:07:00 +0000

[...] Palin’s interview for John Ziegler’s “How Obama Got Elected” project (video posted here). He gives some reasons why Palin’s interviews are a disaster, regardless of whether they [...]

By: links for 2009-01-10 « natthedem’s domain

links for 2009-01-10 « natthedem’s domain — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:01:26 +0000

[...] Liberal Values – Sarah Palin Is Wrong About Caroline Kennedy, You Know [...]

By: DB

DB — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:04:19 +0000

“I love how liberals always use talking points and avoid substance when attacking a conservative! ”

Conservatives NEVER do that. Ha!

What I love more than Sarah Palin gaffes are her defenders.

By: Ron Chusid

Ron Chusid — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:41:20 +0000

Tom,

The post refers to Caroline Kennedy as being “upper class” not “upper middle class.”

By: Tom de Plume

Tom de Plume — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:04:49 +0000

Caroline Kennedy is “upper middle class”?

Excuse me?

Last I looked, the upper middle class were households in the $100k/year income range. If that’s all that bimbo is making it’s due to the tax shelters her family uses to hide their real wealth.

By: Ron Chusid

Ron Chusid — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:14:23 +0000

Jajjal,

Interesting how you resort to labeling my comments “talking points” as a means for you to avoid responding to any of the arguments meaningfully. Just saying they lack substance does not make that so. Of course conservatives tend to think that if they repeat something which is counter to fact loudly enough they can make it so. It doesn’t really work that way, which is why Palin and other conservatives are doing so poorly.

Sarah Palin had her chance on Saturday Night Live but just sat there with limited lines as she was not able to handle anything meaningful.

Looking at this and her other interviews, Palin is clearly the one who is unable to handle the criticism and responds by her ridiculous attacks on others.

Palin’s problems have nothing to do with being a woman or being treated differently because of being a woman. She was treated as she was because she was clearly unqualified to be vice president.

By: Jajjal

Jajjal — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:44:56 +0000

correction – on most any issue in a public forum

By: Jajjal

Jajjal — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:44:03 +0000

I love how liberals always use talking points and avoid substance when attacking a conservative! I actually would like to see Palin return to Saturday night live to do an imitation of perky Katie Couric and Schlosberg – both wealthy liberals who scorn conservatism. Unfortunately, it’s tough for a woman to play the bad guy and most any issue in the public form (including a Hilary) because women are automatically handled differently by the media

By: DB

DB — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:07:32 +0000

This is awesome. I can’t get enough of Palin looking like an ass. I almost can’t wait for 2012 just to see how this all plays out when she goes up against her own kind!