<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin And Special Needs Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. S</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184&#038;cpage=1#comment-207855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184#comment-207855</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed your post, and think the mom raises some excellent questions.  I am a future special education teacher who has some experience working with Down Syndrome children.  I think it is fine that Palin would like to stand up for special needs parents (and I wouldn&#039;t question her sincerity since she is a special needs Mom).  However, are the policies of a potential McCain administration going to help special needs parents?  Odds are, probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your post, and think the mom raises some excellent questions.  I am a future special education teacher who has some experience working with Down Syndrome children.  I think it is fine that Palin would like to stand up for special needs parents (and I wouldn&#8217;t question her sincerity since she is a special needs Mom).  However, are the policies of a potential McCain administration going to help special needs parents?  Odds are, probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIll</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184&#038;cpage=1#comment-207779</link>
		<dc:creator>JIll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184#comment-207779</guid>
		<description>I’m not typically a political animal, but, given the current state of the union, the proposals on the table, and how it will affect my child…I’ll ask you to forgive my cynicism and distrust in the vague generalities and inconsistencies I subjected myself to this morning.
 I’ve now heard and read her speech. Great, we’re going to freeze spending, but fully fund IDEA. What happens to other programs in the Domestic Discretionary Budget for that to happen? Pell Grants, the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, WIC, clean-energy research, Section 8 housing — dozens and dozens of programs will need to be cut by an average of 6.4%. Yeah.While she hooked the ticket up to the idea of funding IDEA, there was no strong commitment to it, nor plan proposed for implementing it.
She completely ignored the Community Choice Act (CCA) which would make $$ that is normally spent on institutionalization available for home-based care.
She talked about ‘choices’ in education (private vs public), but made no mention of any guidelines that would prevent schools from discriminating against our children based on test scores.
As she rightly said “For many parents of children with disabilities, the most valuable thing of all is information.” What she totally glossed over, though, is that the information comes through sources her ticket is NOT endorsing: guaranteed medical coverage for all children. Where does most of our early information about our children and their ‘condition’ come from? Our doctors. Doctors our children won’t see without insurance. Therapists that our children won’t see without coverage. Visiting nurses that will no longer ‘visit’ us because our child isn’t able to get insurance (’pre-existing’ and ‘congenital’ often are treated the same by insurance companies).
First we have to GET information — from healthcare providers - and we need insurance for that!! Then, we need to be able to access services - and we need insurance for that!! Am I the only one seeing the disconnect here?
I think the commitment to education is great, really, but what about EI therapies? What about AFTER school is over with? It’s all well and good to say “We’ll give you a ton of educational choices.” but it does me no good if I can’t afford medical coverage for a child who may not SURVIVE until school age without OHS; nor does it benefit me, as the parent of a 30 yo who needs day-to-day assistance to know that she ‘could have gone to private school.’
Frankly, this speech was a disappointment on many levels. Not the least of which was the underlying assumption that education was the main concern of parents of children w/ special needs. We want them educated, yes - but HEALTHY children learn better than UNhealthy children. It has to be from the bottom up - healthy children learn better. You can’t go ‘top-down’ — you can’t ‘teach a child healthy.’
So far, the M/P ticket has not impressed me on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not typically a political animal, but, given the current state of the union, the proposals on the table, and how it will affect my child…I’ll ask you to forgive my cynicism and distrust in the vague generalities and inconsistencies I subjected myself to this morning.<br />
 I’ve now heard and read her speech. Great, we’re going to freeze spending, but fully fund IDEA. What happens to other programs in the Domestic Discretionary Budget for that to happen? Pell Grants, the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, WIC, clean-energy research, Section 8 housing — dozens and dozens of programs will need to be cut by an average of 6.4%. Yeah.While she hooked the ticket up to the idea of funding IDEA, there was no strong commitment to it, nor plan proposed for implementing it.<br />
She completely ignored the Community Choice Act (CCA) which would make $$ that is normally spent on institutionalization available for home-based care.<br />
She talked about ‘choices’ in education (private vs public), but made no mention of any guidelines that would prevent schools from discriminating against our children based on test scores.<br />
As she rightly said “For many parents of children with disabilities, the most valuable thing of all is information.” What she totally glossed over, though, is that the information comes through sources her ticket is NOT endorsing: guaranteed medical coverage for all children. Where does most of our early information about our children and their ‘condition’ come from? Our doctors. Doctors our children won’t see without insurance. Therapists that our children won’t see without coverage. Visiting nurses that will no longer ‘visit’ us because our child isn’t able to get insurance (’pre-existing’ and ‘congenital’ often are treated the same by insurance companies).<br />
First we have to GET information — from healthcare providers &#8211; and we need insurance for that!! Then, we need to be able to access services &#8211; and we need insurance for that!! Am I the only one seeing the disconnect here?<br />
I think the commitment to education is great, really, but what about EI therapies? What about AFTER school is over with? It’s all well and good to say “We’ll give you a ton of educational choices.” but it does me no good if I can’t afford medical coverage for a child who may not SURVIVE until school age without OHS; nor does it benefit me, as the parent of a 30 yo who needs day-to-day assistance to know that she ‘could have gone to private school.’<br />
Frankly, this speech was a disappointment on many levels. Not the least of which was the underlying assumption that education was the main concern of parents of children w/ special needs. We want them educated, yes &#8211; but HEALTHY children learn better than UNhealthy children. It has to be from the bottom up &#8211; healthy children learn better. You can’t go ‘top-down’ — you can’t ‘teach a child healthy.’<br />
So far, the M/P ticket has not impressed me on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184&#038;cpage=1#comment-207558</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184#comment-207558</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you. I have a 26 year old daughter with developmental disabilities which I have raised by myself since she was 2 years old. We need govt. to support us and give us the resources we need to empower, educate, get housing, and find trained PCA&#039;s and monies to support our loved ones so they can live and grow in their communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you. I have a 26 year old daughter with developmental disabilities which I have raised by myself since she was 2 years old. We need govt. to support us and give us the resources we need to empower, educate, get housing, and find trained PCA&#8217;s and monies to support our loved ones so they can live and grow in their communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary o'Malley</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184&#038;cpage=1#comment-207523</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary o'Malley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184#comment-207523</guid>
		<description>Wonderful list of talking points!!!!!! I am a parent of five children with a special needs son who is involved in both the physical realm and mental health realm.Can we get the big media to pick this up or send it to someone who could get it out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful list of talking points!!!!!! I am a parent of five children with a special needs son who is involved in both the physical realm and mental health realm.Can we get the big media to pick this up or send it to someone who could get it out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish Maunder</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184&#038;cpage=1#comment-207481</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish Maunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184#comment-207481</guid>
		<description>Fabulous questions.. I too am the parent of two special needs children now 22 and 25 years old. You have said it all..thank you! 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous questions.. I too am the parent of two special needs children now 22 and 25 years old. You have said it all..thank you! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beingajoe</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184&#038;cpage=1#comment-207480</link>
		<dc:creator>beingajoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=5184#comment-207480</guid>
		<description>Like most things, she in unprepared to answer.  She is just trying to milk this issue to get support like McCain did last night during the debate.  By the way, here is a website I found that shares all the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palinspin.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sarah Palin Pictures&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and supports &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palinspin.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most things, she in unprepared to answer.  She is just trying to milk this issue to get support like McCain did last night during the debate.  By the way, here is a website I found that shares all the <strong><a href="http://www.palinspin.com" rel="nofollow">Sarah Palin Pictures</a></strong> and supports <strong><a href="http://www.palinspin.com" rel="nofollow"> Barack Obama</a></strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
