<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin Pick Harms Republican Ticket In The Supermarkets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Palin Controversies Remain In The News - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-213759</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin Controversies Remain In The News - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-213759</guid>
		<description>[...] being discussed in the blogosphere is in follow up of a claim by The National Enquirer that Palin had an affair with her husband&#8217;s business associate. Today Andrew Sullivan posted a blog entry stating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being discussed in the blogosphere is in follow up of a claim by The National Enquirer that Palin had an affair with her husband&#8217;s business associate. Today Andrew Sullivan posted a blog entry stating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205780</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205780</guid>
		<description>I see your point about him. No problem with removing the link. It does make sense for real bloggers to ostracize someone who behaves like he does. It is sometimes amusing to see how convoluted his logic can be but for the most part he sure doesn&#039;t make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point about him. No problem with removing the link. It does make sense for real bloggers to ostracize someone who behaves like he does. It is sometimes amusing to see how convoluted his logic can be but for the most part he sure doesn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205778</guid>
		<description>Such dishonesty is typical of Charters of Dreams. I hope you don&#039;t mind that I removed the link back to his blog from your comment. As he does not abide by decent netiquette he has been banned from commenting here and all links to his &quot;blog&quot; have been removed. 

His &lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: line-through;&quot;&gt;writings&lt;/span&gt; irrational rants consist of resorting to personal attacks whenever the facts show he is wrong, and generally consists of lying about what others have said to give him something to attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such dishonesty is typical of Charters of Dreams. I hope you don&#8217;t mind that I removed the link back to his blog from your comment. As he does not abide by decent netiquette he has been banned from commenting here and all links to his &#8220;blog&#8221; have been removed. </p>
<p>His <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">writings</span> irrational rants consist of resorting to personal attacks whenever the facts show he is wrong, and generally consists of lying about what others have said to give him something to attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205776</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205776</guid>
		<description>I see Charters of Dreams is as deranged as ever, linking back here with an untrue account of what you wrote once again. He sure has a bad case of Liberal Derangement Syndrome :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Charters of Dreams is as deranged as ever, linking back here with an untrue account of what you wrote once again. He sure has a bad case of Liberal Derangement Syndrome <img src='http://liberalvaluesblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205603</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205603</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Palin Pick Harms Republican Ticket In The Supermarkets...&lt;/strong&gt;

While hits from Google searches on Palin have increased traffic here, the vast majority of voters will not read blog posts on Palin. Far more voters, especially the working class women which the campaign hopes Palin will attract to the Republican ticke...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Palin Pick Harms Republican Ticket In The Supermarkets&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>While hits from Google searches on Palin have increased traffic here, the vast majority of voters will not read blog posts on Palin. Far more voters, especially the working class women which the campaign hopes Palin will attract to the Republican ticke&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulises Jorge</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulises Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205583</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Other politicians don’t use their kids as a prop to the degree Palin has after making such a fuss about saying they are out of bounds.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

Well, there’s the little matter of those rumors at the Daily Kos about Sarah Palin faking a pregnancy to cover for her daughter and the press following up on them.  So how it is “making such a fuss” to ask the press to stop spreading false rumors around?  Tell me, what you would do if you were in her shoes? 

Lets say she follows your advice and leaves the kids in Alaska and says nothing about Bristol being five months pregnant.  You think the press would leave them alone?  Remember that Bristol’s pregnancy was widely known in Wasillia, so that story would have come out in the open anyway.  How do you think that would’ve played out? “&lt;strong&gt;SARAH PALIN HIDES HER DAUGHTER TO CONCEAL PREGNANCY!&lt;/strong&gt;”  That’s an exaggeration of course… the press wouldn’t do such a thing….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<strong><em>Other politicians don’t use their kids as a prop to the degree Palin has after making such a fuss about saying they are out of bounds.</em></strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, there’s the little matter of those rumors at the Daily Kos about Sarah Palin faking a pregnancy to cover for her daughter and the press following up on them.  So how it is “making such a fuss” to ask the press to stop spreading false rumors around?  Tell me, what you would do if you were in her shoes? </p>
<p>Lets say she follows your advice and leaves the kids in Alaska and says nothing about Bristol being five months pregnant.  You think the press would leave them alone?  Remember that Bristol’s pregnancy was widely known in Wasillia, so that story would have come out in the open anyway.  How do you think that would’ve played out? “<strong>SARAH PALIN HIDES HER DAUGHTER TO CONCEAL PREGNANCY!</strong>”  That’s an exaggeration of course… the press wouldn’t do such a thing….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205579</guid>
		<description>Other politicians don&#039;t use their kids as a prop to the degree Palin has after making such a fuss about saying they are out of bounds. Note that it is AP, not a partisan source, which has written the article accusing Palin of this contradiction. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other politicians don&#8217;t use their kids as a prop to the degree Palin has after making such a fuss about saying they are out of bounds. Note that it is AP, not a partisan source, which has written the article accusing Palin of this contradiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulises Jorge</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulises Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205577</guid>
		<description>&quot;All of this occurred before the Republicans &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/parading-the-ba.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;used Palin’s baby as a prop&lt;/a&gt; during the television coverage of Palin’s speech.&quot;

I&#039;m sorry, but weren&#039;t Barack Obama&#039;s daughters with his wife at the Democrats convention last week?  Wasn&#039;t Chelsea Clinton alongside her parents when Bill Clinton was running for presidents?  Who were those girls with Al and Tipper Gore at the 2000 Democrats&#039; convention?
Isn&#039;t that what politicians do all the time, show their family and kids around?  What have changed now, why are the Palin&#039;s kids fair game...?  Is the media now digging around Malia Obama&#039;s school records for some kind of expose in the National Enquirer..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All of this occurred before the Republicans <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/parading-the-ba.html" rel="nofollow">used Palin’s baby as a prop</a> during the television coverage of Palin’s speech.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but weren&#8217;t Barack Obama&#8217;s daughters with his wife at the Democrats convention last week?  Wasn&#8217;t Chelsea Clinton alongside her parents when Bill Clinton was running for presidents?  Who were those girls with Al and Tipper Gore at the 2000 Democrats&#8217; convention?<br />
Isn&#8217;t that what politicians do all the time, show their family and kids around?  What have changed now, why are the Palin&#8217;s kids fair game&#8230;?  Is the media now digging around Malia Obama&#8217;s school records for some kind of expose in the National Enquirer..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212&#038;cpage=1#comment-205574</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4212#comment-205574</guid>
		<description>Speeches are great aren&#039;t they. But one must consider who actually wrote the speech. The rhetoric was so thick one could hardly breeth. Some might have a different name for it, but it;s all the same, no meat, no potatoes, all hot air. Where&#039;s the beef? 


I am sure, if elected, John and Sarah will continue business as usual, prolonged wars, rigid stance against the people of the world and a hypocracy of words from their own speeches.


If you listen to Sarah&#039;s doubt of change tyhen you realize she shares no optimism for it, because the conservatives don&#039;t believe in equality, fairness, healthcare, energy or any of the true issues that affect all US citizens.


Well, do the research. Surprise!!





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speeches are great aren&#8217;t they. But one must consider who actually wrote the speech. The rhetoric was so thick one could hardly breeth. Some might have a different name for it, but it;s all the same, no meat, no potatoes, all hot air. Where&#8217;s the beef? </p>
<p>I am sure, if elected, John and Sarah will continue business as usual, prolonged wars, rigid stance against the people of the world and a hypocracy of words from their own speeches.</p>
<p>If you listen to Sarah&#8217;s doubt of change tyhen you realize she shares no optimism for it, because the conservatives don&#8217;t believe in equality, fairness, healthcare, energy or any of the true issues that affect all US citizens.</p>
<p>Well, do the research. Surprise!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
