<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reactionary Views of Sarah Palin, Miss Wasilla 1984</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:14:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Palin Backed Alaska Independence and Called Shallow By Woman Claiming To Be the Real Miss Congeniality - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205468</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin Backed Alaska Independence and Called Shallow By Woman Claiming To Be the Real Miss Congeniality - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205468</guid>
		<description>[...] turns out that that Sarah Palin&#8217;s backing of Patrick Buchanan for president in 1999 was not the most extreme case of her backing a far right third party. Members [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] turns out that that Sarah Palin&#8217;s backing of Patrick Buchanan for president in 1999 was not the most extreme case of her backing a far right third party. Members [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Extremism of Sarah Palin&#8217;s Pastors - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205439</link>
		<dc:creator>The Extremism of Sarah Palin&#8217;s Pastors - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205439</guid>
		<description>[...] revelation that Sarah Palin was a supporter of Patrick Buchanan already killed any hope the Republicans had for increasing their share of the Jewish vote. What [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] revelation that Sarah Palin was a supporter of Patrick Buchanan already killed any hope the Republicans had for increasing their share of the Jewish vote. What [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Abuse of Power - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin&#8217;s Abuse of Power - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205417</guid>
		<description>[...] the trend of moving the Republican Party in an authoritarian direction. Besides Palin&#8217;s far right views on social issues there are serious questions about her abuse of power. Being on vacation and in a hurry to get down [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the trend of moving the Republican Party in an authoritarian direction. Besides Palin&#8217;s far right views on social issues there are serious questions about her abuse of power. Being on vacation and in a hurry to get down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clintonistas and the Far Right Extremism of Sarah Palin - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205400</link>
		<dc:creator>Clintonistas and the Far Right Extremism of Sarah Palin - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205400</guid>
		<description>[...] Previously I noted a pro-Clinton forum which has become enthusiastic about supporting the McCain/Palin ticket. This goes along very well with the realignment of the parties which has been going on for the past several years, with the views (and political tactics) of many Clintonistas being far closer to those of George Bush, Karl Rove, and John McCain than to liberals such as Barack Obama. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previously I noted a pro-Clinton forum which has become enthusiastic about supporting the McCain/Palin ticket. This goes along very well with the realignment of the parties which has been going on for the past several years, with the views (and political tactics) of many Clintonistas being far closer to those of George Bush, Karl Rove, and John McCain than to liberals such as Barack Obama. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205397</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205397</guid>
		<description>Christopher,

I&#039;ve commented many times here on the anti-liberal views of many Clinton supporters, so their support for McCain/Palin is not really a surprise to me.

The rumors are that Palin&#039;s last child is really the child of her teenage daughter (who missed school for seven months due to mono.) At this time I don&#039;t think there is much to this story, but we will see what happens as people look further into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve commented many times here on the anti-liberal views of many Clinton supporters, so their support for McCain/Palin is not really a surprise to me.</p>
<p>The rumors are that Palin&#8217;s last child is really the child of her teenage daughter (who missed school for seven months due to mono.) At this time I don&#8217;t think there is much to this story, but we will see what happens as people look further into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205392</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205392</guid>
		<description>The PUMA kooks at lunatic sites like No Quarter are celebrating Sarah Palin like she&#039;s Hillary 2.0.

Nevermind that Palin is a radical, rightwing, religious conservative who is 100% anti-choice and says no woman should have access to abortion, even in the case of rape or if the woman&#039;s life is threatened. If you&#039;re preggers -- you will carry the child to term and deliver it.

Palin is also vehemently antigay despite the fact her own uncle is gay and has lived with his partner for more than 20 years. 

The questions around the last child, the one born with Downs Syndrome is the story that has the blogosphere in Alaska buzzing the most over. How can it be that no one, and I mean absolutely no one in Palin&#039;s office, new she was with child? Palin just breezed in on Monday and announced to everyone she&#039;d given birth over the weekend.

Very strange behavior if you&#039;ve ever worked in an office and a colleague or co-worker became pregnant. This is always grounds for a party, pizza, cards and gifts. I&#039;ve worked for large corporations and non-profits and it&#039;s the same everywhere.

Not in the governor&#039;s office in Juneau. Very odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PUMA kooks at lunatic sites like No Quarter are celebrating Sarah Palin like she&#8217;s Hillary 2.0.</p>
<p>Nevermind that Palin is a radical, rightwing, religious conservative who is 100% anti-choice and says no woman should have access to abortion, even in the case of rape or if the woman&#8217;s life is threatened. If you&#8217;re preggers &#8212; you will carry the child to term and deliver it.</p>
<p>Palin is also vehemently antigay despite the fact her own uncle is gay and has lived with his partner for more than 20 years. </p>
<p>The questions around the last child, the one born with Downs Syndrome is the story that has the blogosphere in Alaska buzzing the most over. How can it be that no one, and I mean absolutely no one in Palin&#8217;s office, new she was with child? Palin just breezed in on Monday and announced to everyone she&#8217;d given birth over the weekend.</p>
<p>Very strange behavior if you&#8217;ve ever worked in an office and a colleague or co-worker became pregnant. This is always grounds for a party, pizza, cards and gifts. I&#8217;ve worked for large corporations and non-profits and it&#8217;s the same everywhere.</p>
<p>Not in the governor&#8217;s office in Juneau. Very odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205391</guid>
		<description>Wow. I&#039;ve been reading so much today about Palin, and it&#039;s almost beyond belief. She&#039;s vulnerable in so many ways. Previous support for the bridge to nowhere is just one. I was going to try to list them all, but so many others are doing a credible job. Her approval rating has been dropping recently as troopergate has evolved into something potentially serious. Newspapers in Alaska are providing a lot of material.
Not only that but she&#039;s already saying a lot of not-so-smart things in interviews: &quot;It&#039;s nice to see another part of the country.&quot; She&#039;s no Dan Quayle and she&#039;s certainly no Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;ve been reading so much today about Palin, and it&#8217;s almost beyond belief. She&#8217;s vulnerable in so many ways. Previous support for the bridge to nowhere is just one. I was going to try to list them all, but so many others are doing a credible job. Her approval rating has been dropping recently as troopergate has evolved into something potentially serious. Newspapers in Alaska are providing a lot of material.<br />
Not only that but she&#8217;s already saying a lot of not-so-smart things in interviews: &#8220;It&#8217;s nice to see another part of the country.&#8221; She&#8217;s no Dan Quayle and she&#8217;s certainly no Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keanus</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205388</link>
		<dc:creator>Keanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205388</guid>
		<description>Per the US Census Bureau, Wasilla&#039;s population in 1990 was 4,028; 2000, 5469; and 2007 (est), 9780. Whichever figure one uses, it&#039;s clearly a very small town. And it&#039;s only responsible for recreation, roads and little else. Police, fire and schools are a borough (like counties in the lower 48) responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per the US Census Bureau, Wasilla&#8217;s population in 1990 was 4,028; 2000, 5469; and 2007 (est), 9780. Whichever figure one uses, it&#8217;s clearly a very small town. And it&#8217;s only responsible for recreation, roads and little else. Police, fire and schools are a borough (like counties in the lower 48) responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205387</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I found a 1992 road atlas that lists Wasilla as having a population of 5450.  I&#039;m sure there are official census numbers somewhere.
BTW, I&#039;m stunned by how little vetting (or real thinking) went behind this selection.  Here are just a few things that have cropped up in the short time we&#039;ve taken Palin (semi)seriously:
1. She supported Pat Buchanan (thanks for this)
2. She&#039;s willing to overlook her pure reformist ideals to join one of the most lobbyist-laden campaigns in history.
3. There&#039;s a serious on-going investigation into the firing of one of her underlings. Play this video of an Alaskan TV report for more: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKNJ6bfBfIk

This last point might just cause McCain to retract his choice.  From Palin&#039;s earlier comments about the issue, one could conclude that she had nothing to do with it.  Since then - just recently - more information including taped phone calls from her staff have come out, and in the above piece, the fired official puts Palin in the center of it. At one point he had to warn her that she should not be discussing the issue (of firing her ex-brother-in-law) with him.  If true, this could be a big hit.
Palin strikes me as a zealot.  And zealots have many blind spots that get them in trouble.  They don&#039;t listen to reason and don&#039;t compromise, even when it&#039;s in everyone&#039;s best interest to do so.  And they can easily rationalize their own lapses as necessary and acceptable.
Of course, if this does blow up into a full-scale scandal, the right-wing base will claim that she&#039;s being attacked unfairly, which will solidify the base even more.  Fortunately, the extreme right-wing base is smaller than most people realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I found a 1992 road atlas that lists Wasilla as having a population of 5450.  I&#8217;m sure there are official census numbers somewhere.<br />
BTW, I&#8217;m stunned by how little vetting (or real thinking) went behind this selection.  Here are just a few things that have cropped up in the short time we&#8217;ve taken Palin (semi)seriously:<br />
1. She supported Pat Buchanan (thanks for this)<br />
2. She&#8217;s willing to overlook her pure reformist ideals to join one of the most lobbyist-laden campaigns in history.<br />
3. There&#8217;s a serious on-going investigation into the firing of one of her underlings. Play this video of an Alaskan TV report for more: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKNJ6bfBfIk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKNJ6bfBfIk</a></p>
<p>This last point might just cause McCain to retract his choice.  From Palin&#8217;s earlier comments about the issue, one could conclude that she had nothing to do with it.  Since then &#8211; just recently &#8211; more information including taped phone calls from her staff have come out, and in the above piece, the fired official puts Palin in the center of it. At one point he had to warn her that she should not be discussing the issue (of firing her ex-brother-in-law) with him.  If true, this could be a big hit.<br />
Palin strikes me as a zealot.  And zealots have many blind spots that get them in trouble.  They don&#8217;t listen to reason and don&#8217;t compromise, even when it&#8217;s in everyone&#8217;s best interest to do so.  And they can easily rationalize their own lapses as necessary and acceptable.<br />
Of course, if this does blow up into a full-scale scandal, the right-wing base will claim that she&#8217;s being attacked unfairly, which will solidify the base even more.  Fortunately, the extreme right-wing base is smaller than most people realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205384</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205384</guid>
		<description>Tony,

I read population 9000 in one article and went with that but cannot be certain of the accuracy. It is possible that the population was higher as opposed to lower when she was mayor as small towns often have a problem of the young moving away as they graduate and others also leaving due to lack of jobs.  

Regardless of whether it was closer to 6000 or 9000, Palin&#039;s experience in Wasilla hardly compares to Obama&#039;s experience before running for the Senate.  Of course the PUMA kooks who think that Hillary Clinton was also more experienced than Obama due are likely to parrot the right wing kooks who question Obama&#039;s experience. (PUMA kooks, right wing kooks--there I go becoming redundant again.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>I read population 9000 in one article and went with that but cannot be certain of the accuracy. It is possible that the population was higher as opposed to lower when she was mayor as small towns often have a problem of the young moving away as they graduate and others also leaving due to lack of jobs.  </p>
<p>Regardless of whether it was closer to 6000 or 9000, Palin&#8217;s experience in Wasilla hardly compares to Obama&#8217;s experience before running for the Senate.  Of course the PUMA kooks who think that Hillary Clinton was also more experienced than Obama due are likely to parrot the right wing kooks who question Obama&#8217;s experience. (PUMA kooks, right wing kooks&#8211;there I go becoming redundant again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen bean</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205383</link>
		<dc:creator>allen bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205383</guid>
		<description>FWD NEWS TIP

Posted by: Scott &#124; August 30, 2008 1:11 AM

Not only all that, but Ms Palin has had virtually no contact with Jewish people in America. In fact, most Alaskans still use the term &quot;to jew someone down&quot; as part of their every day vocabulary when speaking about bargaining at the store....so I guess Ms Palin has a huge storehouse of inherited antiSemitic fixations based not on hatred but on ignorance. Ask her what she thinks of Jewish people someone? I am sure she only knows about 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWD NEWS TIP</p>
<p>Posted by: Scott | August 30, 2008 1:11 AM</p>
<p>Not only all that, but Ms Palin has had virtually no contact with Jewish people in America. In fact, most Alaskans still use the term &#8220;to jew someone down&#8221; as part of their every day vocabulary when speaking about bargaining at the store&#8230;.so I guess Ms Palin has a huge storehouse of inherited antiSemitic fixations based not on hatred but on ignorance. Ask her what she thinks of Jewish people someone? I am sure she only knows about 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Trainor</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205382</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Trainor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205382</guid>
		<description>Each candidate realized that if he became President, there was a possibility that he may not finish the first or second term.

Candidate A thought long and hard, and chose a human being who would be able to carry on America&#039;s legacy of greatness and hope, and leave people to say, Candidate A was a great man, and left the USA in solid hands.

Candidate B consulted with the highest paid spin doctors, abandoned common sense, and threw down a political gambit based on the arrogance of self-immortality, selecting an election partner who provoked an initial reaction of wtf, and if sworn into the highest office, would make America cry &quot;what have we done, again?&quot;

To a cleaner, safer and more prosperous world!

Joe Trainor

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.solarintell.com&quot; title=&quot;Solar Power Stocks, Alternative Energy Investing Info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SolarIntell.com Clean Energy as a Path to Peace
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windintell.com&quot; title=&quot;WindIntell.comWind Energy investing Stock Quotes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Windntell.com Renewable Power Stocks Investing&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geotherma.info&quot; title=&quot;geothermal energy stocks, geothermal investing website&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Geotherma.info Geothermal Power Companies Stocks&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each candidate realized that if he became President, there was a possibility that he may not finish the first or second term.</p>
<p>Candidate A thought long and hard, and chose a human being who would be able to carry on America&#8217;s legacy of greatness and hope, and leave people to say, Candidate A was a great man, and left the USA in solid hands.</p>
<p>Candidate B consulted with the highest paid spin doctors, abandoned common sense, and threw down a political gambit based on the arrogance of self-immortality, selecting an election partner who provoked an initial reaction of wtf, and if sworn into the highest office, would make America cry &#8220;what have we done, again?&#8221;</p>
<p>To a cleaner, safer and more prosperous world!</p>
<p>Joe Trainor</p>
<p><a href="http://www.solarintell.com" title="Solar Power Stocks, Alternative Energy Investing Info" rel="nofollow">SolarIntell.com Clean Energy as a Path to Peace<br />
</a><a href="http://www.windintell.com" title="WindIntell.comWind Energy investing Stock Quotes" rel="nofollow"><br />
Windntell.com Renewable Power Stocks Investing</a><br />
<a href="http://www.geotherma.info" title="geothermal energy stocks, geothermal investing website" rel="nofollow"><br />
Geotherma.info Geothermal Power Companies Stocks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205380</guid>
		<description>I might point out that, according to the city of Wasilla&#039;s official Web site, the population of that city is 6,715 &lt;em&gt;today&lt;/em&gt;. I think it&#039;s a safe bet to say that when Palin was elected mayor in 1996 the population was even less. Whether or not that&#039;s true, it&#039;s clear that Wasilla equates to no better than Andy Griffith&#039;s Mayberry. He&#039;s another one I&#039;d prefer not to see run for high office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might point out that, according to the city of Wasilla&#8217;s official Web site, the population of that city is 6,715 <em>today</em>. I think it&#8217;s a safe bet to say that when Palin was elected mayor in 1996 the population was even less. Whether or not that&#8217;s true, it&#8217;s clear that Wasilla equates to no better than Andy Griffith&#8217;s Mayberry. He&#8217;s another one I&#8217;d prefer not to see run for high office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: battlebob</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119&#038;cpage=1#comment-205379</link>
		<dc:creator>battlebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=4119#comment-205379</guid>
		<description>Cafferty on CNN had an interesting comment.
The entire state of Alaska has the population of Austin, Texas.
Cafferty considers her selection a joke.  The Repub response was naturally defensive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cafferty on CNN had an interesting comment.<br />
The entire state of Alaska has the population of Austin, Texas.<br />
Cafferty considers her selection a joke.  The Repub response was naturally defensive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
