<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexism and the Clinton Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:25:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Clinton Lost - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285&#038;cpage=1#comment-203222</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Clinton Lost - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285#comment-203222</guid>
		<description>[...] The other essays vary in their accuracy. Some of the woman writers over emphasize the role of sexism. While some of the media coverage was undeniably sexist, Hillary Clinton was in a position to overcome this if not for her faults. She started out far ahead in the race, which would not have been a possibility if sexism was really all that important this year. Hillary Clinton lost because she was Hillary Clinton, not because she was a woman. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The other essays vary in their accuracy. Some of the woman writers over emphasize the role of sexism. While some of the media coverage was undeniably sexist, Hillary Clinton was in a position to overcome this if not for her faults. She started out far ahead in the race, which would not have been a possibility if sexism was really all that important this year. Hillary Clinton lost because she was Hillary Clinton, not because she was a woman. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Democrats More Sexist Then Republicans? - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285&#038;cpage=1#comment-202861</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Democrats More Sexist Then Republicans? - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285#comment-202861</guid>
		<description>[...] course it is untrue that Clinton is winning due to sexism in the Democratic Party and it is untrue that Clinton would be the stronger candidate against John [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course it is untrue that Clinton is winning due to sexism in the Democratic Party and it is untrue that Clinton would be the stronger candidate against John [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton and Obama Split Primaries With Obama Coming Closer to Nomination - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285&#038;cpage=1#comment-202765</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton and Obama Split Primaries With Obama Coming Closer to Nomination - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285#comment-202765</guid>
		<description>[...] about sixteen superdelegates from California. Clinton&#8217;s new line is that she failed to win due to sexism. I hardly believe it is sexism which is keeping Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer from backing Clinton [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about sixteen superdelegates from California. Clinton&#8217;s new line is that she failed to win due to sexism. I hardly believe it is sexism which is keeping Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer from backing Clinton [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richelle</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285&#038;cpage=1#comment-202744</link>
		<dc:creator>Richelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285#comment-202744</guid>
		<description>WOW. Excuse me while I forward this terribly accurate piece. SPOT ON Ron sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. Excuse me while I forward this terribly accurate piece. SPOT ON Ron sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Future Woman President - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285&#038;cpage=1#comment-202690</link>
		<dc:creator>A Future Woman President - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285#comment-202690</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Sexism and the Clinton Campaign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Sexism and the Clinton Campaign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrToketee</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285&#038;cpage=1#comment-202524</link>
		<dc:creator>DrToketee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 23:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3285#comment-202524</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;This is one of the very best summaries of the Hillary situation that i&#039;ve read anywhere, all achieved within a few paragraphs. I can only add that in a few years, millions of women will look back and be ashamed of themselves for backing Hillary so strongly because by doing so they had set the women&#039;s movement back many years. Hillary started the damage on feminism, while our still-naive American women simply made it worse.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This is one of the very best summaries of the Hillary situation that i&#8217;ve read anywhere, all achieved within a few paragraphs. I can only add that in a few years, millions of women will look back and be ashamed of themselves for backing Hillary so strongly because by doing so they had set the women&#8217;s movement back many years. Hillary started the damage on feminism, while our still-naive American women simply made it worse.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
