<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right Wing Bloggers: Stupid or Evil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: retta</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136&#038;cpage=1#comment-187789</link>
		<dc:creator>retta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136#comment-187789</guid>
		<description>R in Republican stands for Racist, Rightwing, and Rich--except for the dumb bitter poor people in small towns who don&#039;t know whats good for them and some dumb blacks who don&#039;t know better and made a couple of dollars.  KKK&#039;s are all Rightwing, Racist, Republicans sellout negroes and colored folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R in Republican stands for Racist, Rightwing, and Rich&#8211;except for the dumb bitter poor people in small towns who don&#8217;t know whats good for them and some dumb blacks who don&#8217;t know better and made a couple of dollars.  KKK&#8217;s are all Rightwing, Racist, Republicans sellout negroes and colored folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136&#038;cpage=1#comment-187776</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136#comment-187776</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a bit of humor, and I don&#039;t get when people try to analyze a joke. It would be just as amusing to have a list of left-wing sites too. 

Besides, the list pales in comparison to what conservatives call liberals on a daily basis - and they aren&#039;t joking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a bit of humor, and I don&#8217;t get when people try to analyze a joke. It would be just as amusing to have a list of left-wing sites too. </p>
<p>Besides, the list pales in comparison to what conservatives call liberals on a daily basis &#8211; and they aren&#8217;t joking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coco</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136&#038;cpage=1#comment-187764</link>
		<dc:creator>Coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136#comment-187764</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have time to read all the descriptions but since I regularly visit every site listed I&#039;m thrilled that the Village Voice thinks they&#039;re all stupid and evil. They must be doing something right. My condolences to more sites than I can name for not making the list. There&#039;s always next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have time to read all the descriptions but since I regularly visit every site listed I&#8217;m thrilled that the Village Voice thinks they&#8217;re all stupid and evil. They must be doing something right. My condolences to more sites than I can name for not making the list. There&#8217;s always next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136&#038;cpage=1#comment-187758</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=3136#comment-187758</guid>
		<description>I was also rather puzzled by McArdle&#039;s inclusion on the list.  Not only is she far from doctrinaire, she is - more importantly - generally quite willing to engage in respectful debate.  To be sure, she is one of the snarkiest bloggers around, but it&#039;s usually quite obvious her jabs are meant in good fun.  As opposed to most of the rest of the crew, who honestly do believe that war opponents want to surrender to al Qaeda.
Moreover, how do you do a parody of the right wing blogosphere and not include Red State or Allahpundit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also rather puzzled by McArdle&#8217;s inclusion on the list.  Not only is she far from doctrinaire, she is &#8211; more importantly &#8211; generally quite willing to engage in respectful debate.  To be sure, she is one of the snarkiest bloggers around, but it&#8217;s usually quite obvious her jabs are meant in good fun.  As opposed to most of the rest of the crew, who honestly do believe that war opponents want to surrender to al Qaeda.<br />
Moreover, how do you do a parody of the right wing blogosphere and not include Red State or Allahpundit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
