So Casey has had a feud with the Clintons. It’s looking like an awful lot of Democratic leaders have had a “feud” with the Clintons. Perhaps a better interpretation would be that the object to the low moral standards of the Clintons.

You have it backwards on Richardson. If Richardson had endorsed Clinton in return for his previous positions then you might call him an opportunist. Lacking principles, Clinton and her supporters cannot see beyond the concept of Richardson owing Clinton the nomination in return for previous appointments.

An opportunist would simply endorse Clinton. A person would principle would do what is best for the party and, more importantly, what is best for the country and endorse Obama.

Like the endorsement from Bill Richardson who owes much of his career to Bill Clinton just made it clear that Richardson is an opportunist and a man of very little integrity and character. His endorsement was not going to make or break any candidate so had he been a man of integrity he would have not endorsed and supported fully whoever the nominee was. Obama might need to watch his back with friends like these.