<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton&#8217;s Problems With Experience and Consistency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Future Woman President - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958&#038;cpage=1#comment-202694</link>
		<dc:creator>A Future Woman President - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958#comment-202694</guid>
		<description>[...] that there is no good reason to support Hillary Clinton other than because she is a woman. She has far less meaningful experience than Barack Obama, and is on the wrong side of virtually every issue I, and many liberal bloggers, care about. If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that there is no good reason to support Hillary Clinton other than because she is a woman. She has far less meaningful experience than Barack Obama, and is on the wrong side of virtually every issue I, and many liberal bloggers, care about. If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Embarrassments for Clinton Campaign - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958&#038;cpage=1#comment-182335</link>
		<dc:creator>More Embarrassments for Clinton Campaign - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958#comment-182335</guid>
		<description>[...] Clinton’s Problems With Experience and Consistency [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clinton’s Problems With Experience and Consistency [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sundei Blues</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958&#038;cpage=1#comment-182010</link>
		<dc:creator>Sundei Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958#comment-182010</guid>
		<description>Clinton will make a &quot;big deal&quot; out of correcting her stance on NAFTA in Tuesday&#039;s last debate...

They say the media is for Barack Obama, WRONG! CNN just had a poll up, &quot;IS OBAMA PATRIOTIC&quot;?  They continually say, &quot;You can&#039;t count the Clintons out...they are the comeback kids.&quot;

The Clinton are always given the benefit of the doubt...and actually, it is the MSM that has planned for a CLINTON vs. MCCAIN&quot; election for the last two years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton will make a &#8220;big deal&#8221; out of correcting her stance on NAFTA in Tuesday&#8217;s last debate&#8230;</p>
<p>They say the media is for Barack Obama, WRONG! CNN just had a poll up, &#8220;IS OBAMA PATRIOTIC&#8221;?  They continually say, &#8220;You can&#8217;t count the Clintons out&#8230;they are the comeback kids.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Clinton are always given the benefit of the doubt&#8230;and actually, it is the MSM that has planned for a CLINTON vs. MCCAIN&#8221; election for the last two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958&#038;cpage=1#comment-181887</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958#comment-181887</guid>
		<description>Mauigirl,

Clinton counts every day since she graduated from law school as part of her 35 years of experience. Making matters worse, sometimes she phrases it to sound like she has a 35 year advantage on Obama. If we similarly count Obama&#039;s experience, she actually has a seventeen year advantage because she is older. Once we look at the quality of the experience, it is a matter of opinion, but I&#039;d place Obama ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mauigirl,</p>
<p>Clinton counts every day since she graduated from law school as part of her 35 years of experience. Making matters worse, sometimes she phrases it to sound like she has a 35 year advantage on Obama. If we similarly count Obama&#8217;s experience, she actually has a seventeen year advantage because she is older. Once we look at the quality of the experience, it is a matter of opinion, but I&#8217;d place Obama ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauigirl</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958&#038;cpage=1#comment-181884</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauigirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958#comment-181884</guid>
		<description>Great summary of the situation.  I too have been put off by Clinton claiming 35 years of experience. I don&#039;t recall how man years she&#039;s been in the Senate but it&#039;s something like 8 at the most (she is in her second term, right?).  Anything before that doesn&#039;t count in my book!

And you are right, it&#039;s about judgment, not experience. And I have disagreed with hers on a number of issues, many of which you list here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary of the situation.  I too have been put off by Clinton claiming 35 years of experience. I don&#8217;t recall how man years she&#8217;s been in the Senate but it&#8217;s something like 8 at the most (she is in her second term, right?).  Anything before that doesn&#8217;t count in my book!</p>
<p>And you are right, it&#8217;s about judgment, not experience. And I have disagreed with hers on a number of issues, many of which you list here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958&#038;cpage=1#comment-181822</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2958#comment-181822</guid>
		<description>Real experiece is a relative point of view! Her strategies got is all wrong!..They were hopeful to ride in her de facto experience which is linked to her husband. But here again there is a problem as the White House scandal in the final years of Bill&#039;s presidency turned many off then and have now rekindled and has turned more off! Democrats do have many conservative voters too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real experiece is a relative point of view! Her strategies got is all wrong!..They were hopeful to ride in her de facto experience which is linked to her husband. But here again there is a problem as the White House scandal in the final years of Bill&#8217;s presidency turned many off then and have now rekindled and has turned more off! Democrats do have many conservative voters too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
