<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Pimping Inherently Offensive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not Only Women Are Subjected To Unfair Attacks - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-218376</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Only Women Are Subjected To Unfair Attacks - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-218376</guid>
		<description>[...] Peter in criticizing the comments claiming Hillary Clinton was pimping her daughter, I wrote a post defending Clinton on this while opposing her candidacy. When posting about the many lies of Sarah Palin I noted regret that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter in criticizing the comments claiming Hillary Clinton was pimping her daughter, I wrote a post defending Clinton on this while opposing her candidacy. When posting about the many lies of Sarah Palin I noted regret that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plum</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-176060</link>
		<dc:creator>plum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-176060</guid>
		<description>And may I say how utterly depressing this whole brouhaha is. Obama seeks to end partisan negative politics by rising above and appealing to people&#039;s better angels. In her own way, Clinton also seeks to end partisan negative politics -- by constantly playing the victim. I fear her tactics will be more effective in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And may I say how utterly depressing this whole brouhaha is. Obama seeks to end partisan negative politics by rising above and appealing to people&#8217;s better angels. In her own way, Clinton also seeks to end partisan negative politics &#8212; by constantly playing the victim. I fear her tactics will be more effective in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plum</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-176058</link>
		<dc:creator>plum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-176058</guid>
		<description>Nathan -- Damn, that&#039;s an excellent point. I also was really supportive of Clinton, but that linkage never occurred to me. Huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan &#8212; Damn, that&#8217;s an excellent point. I also was really supportive of Clinton, but that linkage never occurred to me. Huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman of the Year - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-175963</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman of the Year - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-175963</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Pimping Inherently Offensive? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Pimping Inherently Offensive? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidL</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-175950</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-175950</guid>
		<description>Just where does Mrs. Clinton get off complaining about disparaging treatment of women?  The Clintons have been abusing women for years, and it was Mrs. Clinton who managed the bimbo eruptions, that is smearing B.J.&#039;s girl friends and victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just where does Mrs. Clinton get off complaining about disparaging treatment of women?  The Clintons have been abusing women for years, and it was Mrs. Clinton who managed the bimbo eruptions, that is smearing B.J.&#8217;s girl friends and victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-175917</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 07:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-175917</guid>
		<description>From the perspective of the Clinton campaign this is actually a logical position.

Most Democrats do not think Democrats should debate on Fox and give them credibility as they see Fox as a biased organization which reports on them in an unfair and inaccurate manner.

The Clinton campaign sees MSNBC as a biased organization which reports on them in an unfair and inaccurate manner, and therefore does not want to debate there.

They might also see Fox differently. Republicans want Clinton to be the nominee because most likely McCain would beat Clinton but loose to Obama. Clinton knows that if Fox is biased in the handling of the debate, the bias would be in her favor during the nomination battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the perspective of the Clinton campaign this is actually a logical position.</p>
<p>Most Democrats do not think Democrats should debate on Fox and give them credibility as they see Fox as a biased organization which reports on them in an unfair and inaccurate manner.</p>
<p>The Clinton campaign sees MSNBC as a biased organization which reports on them in an unfair and inaccurate manner, and therefore does not want to debate there.</p>
<p>They might also see Fox differently. Republicans want Clinton to be the nominee because most likely McCain would beat Clinton but loose to Obama. Clinton knows that if Fox is biased in the handling of the debate, the bias would be in her favor during the nomination battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natthedem</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-175915</link>
		<dc:creator>Natthedem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 07:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2868#comment-175915</guid>
		<description>I was with the Clintons on this, right up until the moment that &lt;a href=&quot;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gP9Jo_s52WOvDYNXIXh_XdEma-fAD8UMHGQG0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Howard Wolfson said&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;I, at this point, can&#039;t envision a scenario where we would continue to engage in debates on that network.&quot;

Really?

Let&#039;s not get all indignant about networks being malicious in their coverage when earlier this week, they wanted Obama to agree to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/05/clinton_challenges_obama_to_a.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;debate on Fox News&lt;/a&gt;.

FOX NEWS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was with the Clintons on this, right up until the moment that <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gP9Jo_s52WOvDYNXIXh_XdEma-fAD8UMHGQG0" rel="nofollow">Howard Wolfson said</a>: &#8220;I, at this point, can&#8217;t envision a scenario where we would continue to engage in debates on that network.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not get all indignant about networks being malicious in their coverage when earlier this week, they wanted Obama to agree to a <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/05/clinton_challenges_obama_to_a.html" rel="nofollow">debate on Fox News</a>.</p>
<p>FOX NEWS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
