<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Differences Between Obama and Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Die Hards Pushing For McCain over Obama - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-204238</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Die Hards Pushing For McCain over Obama - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-204238</guid>
		<description>[...] candidate for 2008. The claim that Clinton is more liberal is hardly supported by looking at the differences in their positions on many issues. Clinton&#8217;s views on bannning flag burning and her vendetta against video games and cartoon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] candidate for 2008. The claim that Clinton is more liberal is hardly supported by looking at the differences in their positions on many issues. Clinton&#8217;s views on bannning flag burning and her vendetta against video games and cartoon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreams of a Clinton Revival - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-204053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreams of a Clinton Revival - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-204053</guid>
		<description>[...] coming from many Clinton supporters that there is little difference between Clinton and Obama on the issues. Besides, someone who ran for president in a manner as dishonest and disrespectful of the basic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coming from many Clinton supporters that there is little difference between Clinton and Obama on the issues. Besides, someone who ran for president in a manner as dishonest and disrespectful of the basic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listening to Obama - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-203942</link>
		<dc:creator>Listening to Obama - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-203942</guid>
		<description>[...] there are significant underlying differences between the two which I discussed in many posts, such as here. While differences beween Clinton and Obama do not matter any longer with regards to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there are significant underlying differences between the two which I discussed in many posts, such as here. While differences beween Clinton and Obama do not matter any longer with regards to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Clinton Lost - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-203224</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Clinton Lost - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-203224</guid>
		<description>[...] message. This included her support for going to war in Iraq, as Kathleen Hall Jamieson wrote, but extended to other issues. With the conventional wisdom erroneously claiming that the two held the same beliefs most voters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] message. This included her support for going to war in Iraq, as Kathleen Hall Jamieson wrote, but extended to other issues. With the conventional wisdom erroneously claiming that the two held the same beliefs most voters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-203051</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-203051</guid>
		<description>Many people keep telling me that Obama is just good at saying what the crowd he is speaking to wants to hear. I do not see that in him, I see honesty, and willingness to listen. In Clinton, I have seen dishonesty, (ie. Bosnia trip) and by not getting on board behind Obama and giving him support, I have seen unwillingness to listen.(??) Am I wrong? The democratic party in many areas seem to be begging her to help unite the party. She either doesn&#039;t listen, or just what is she doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people keep telling me that Obama is just good at saying what the crowd he is speaking to wants to hear. I do not see that in him, I see honesty, and willingness to listen. In Clinton, I have seen dishonesty, (ie. Bosnia trip) and by not getting on board behind Obama and giving him support, I have seen unwillingness to listen.(??) Am I wrong? The democratic party in many areas seem to be begging her to help unite the party. She either doesn&#8217;t listen, or just what is she doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Clinton Protest - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-203004</link>
		<dc:creator>The Clinton Protest - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-203004</guid>
		<description>[...] while Obama supporters can provide real examples of dishonest campaigning from Clinton, as well as real differences in policy, the objections from the Clinton camp come down to a pack of nonsense. You know that their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while Obama supporters can provide real examples of dishonest campaigning from Clinton, as well as real differences in policy, the objections from the Clinton camp come down to a pack of nonsense. You know that their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Future Woman President - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-202696</link>
		<dc:creator>A Future Woman President - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-202696</guid>
		<description>[...] She has far less meaningful experience than Barack Obama, and is on the wrong side of virtually every issue I, and many liberal bloggers, care about. If Hillary Clinton was either a man, or not married to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] She has far less meaningful experience than Barack Obama, and is on the wrong side of virtually every issue I, and many liberal bloggers, care about. If Hillary Clinton was either a man, or not married to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexism and the Clinton Campaign - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-202459</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexism and the Clinton Campaign - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-202459</guid>
		<description>[...] Clinton actually has far less meaningful experience than Barack Obama, and certainly far poorer judgment in matters of policy. Perhaps most importantly, she rejects the liberal values which hopefully differentiate a Democrat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clinton actually has far less meaningful experience than Barack Obama, and certainly far poorer judgment in matters of policy. Perhaps most importantly, she rejects the liberal values which hopefully differentiate a Democrat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-195313</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-195313</guid>
		<description>I was recently asked by a  friend who was I voting for? Clinton because she is a woman or Obama because he is black. Of course my response being that I will vote for the person who will best help this country come up from the depression that it is currently in. But, I will be honest in saying that I was unclear what either persons&#039; views were on certain issues because they indeed did sound the same. So, Ron, thank you. You made it all very clear for me. I was already leaning towards Obama, especially after Hillary&#039;s very femine, emotional, bi-polar breakdown on television. You can&#039;t be a ball-buster and a lady at the same time. One or the other please. But, I now see the big differences and I know now without a doubt who I will vote for. Thanks Ron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently asked by a  friend who was I voting for? Clinton because she is a woman or Obama because he is black. Of course my response being that I will vote for the person who will best help this country come up from the depression that it is currently in. But, I will be honest in saying that I was unclear what either persons&#8217; views were on certain issues because they indeed did sound the same. So, Ron, thank you. You made it all very clear for me. I was already leaning towards Obama, especially after Hillary&#8217;s very femine, emotional, bi-polar breakdown on television. You can&#8217;t be a ball-buster and a lady at the same time. One or the other please. But, I now see the big differences and I know now without a doubt who I will vote for. Thanks Ron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shae</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-194665</link>
		<dc:creator>Shae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-194665</guid>
		<description>I was undecided and am duly influenced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was undecided and am duly influenced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Clinton vs. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-188786</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Clinton vs. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-188786</guid>
		<description>[...] most likely the Republicans will win. As is Ed, I&#8217;ve often been critical of Clinton&#8217;s nanny state [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most likely the Republicans will win. As is Ed, I&#8217;ve often been critical of Clinton&#8217;s nanny state [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electability And The People Each Candidate Attracts - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-188275</link>
		<dc:creator>Electability And The People Each Candidate Attracts - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-188275</guid>
		<description>[...] to be seen as offering something significant in return on issues we care about, but Clinton is far too often on the wrong side. It is possible that with current distaste for the GOP that Clinton could still win, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be seen as offering something significant in return on issues we care about, but Clinton is far too often on the wrong side. It is possible that with current distaste for the GOP that Clinton could still win, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-188073</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-188073</guid>
		<description>I lost respect for Rice due to the way she handled warnings about al Qaeda before 9/11.

I might forgive her for not having acted on them as before 9/11 the Bush administration&#039;s view that a non-government entity could not do us serious harm was understandable (even if wrong). However I cannot respect her for the way she subsequently denied having receiving the warnings about al Qaeda from the Clinton administration when there was a clear paper trail that she had received them. 

I worry about someone who responds to being wrong by resorting to such denial. It reminds me of her boss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost respect for Rice due to the way she handled warnings about al Qaeda before 9/11.</p>
<p>I might forgive her for not having acted on them as before 9/11 the Bush administration&#8217;s view that a non-government entity could not do us serious harm was understandable (even if wrong). However I cannot respect her for the way she subsequently denied having receiving the warnings about al Qaeda from the Clinton administration when there was a clear paper trail that she had received them. </p>
<p>I worry about someone who responds to being wrong by resorting to such denial. It reminds me of her boss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-188066</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-188066</guid>
		<description>Iam not for either canadidate but just remember two things  

1. 1993 healthcare--  wined and dinned her CEO friends and got  ZERO  done. 

2. Whitewater gate  and her  1,000 into 100,000 trading.   Both lies and against the law if true.


This country elected her hubby nicknamed &quot;slick willy&quot;  and believe it or not this country is paying for that mistake.  Ask anyone who was part of Enron or Worldcom.  Over inflated economy is also bad since a correction(ression) is needed.   Bush has made some mistakes but Hillary is hated not due to being a woman but because of her stances and lack of productivity. 

The best reason to vote against her &quot;she lies like her husband&quot;   two examples above and just recently the latest spin on her bosnia trip.  The lies won&#039;t end so why even elect a person like that to president,  woman or not.  

I would vote for Rice in a heartbeat and the world would get a strong black woman as president...   hummmm just a thought.

Good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iam not for either canadidate but just remember two things  </p>
<p>1. 1993 healthcare&#8211;  wined and dinned her CEO friends and got  ZERO  done. </p>
<p>2. Whitewater gate  and her  1,000 into 100,000 trading.   Both lies and against the law if true.</p>
<p>This country elected her hubby nicknamed &#8220;slick willy&#8221;  and believe it or not this country is paying for that mistake.  Ask anyone who was part of Enron or Worldcom.  Over inflated economy is also bad since a correction(ression) is needed.   Bush has made some mistakes but Hillary is hated not due to being a woman but because of her stances and lack of productivity. </p>
<p>The best reason to vote against her &#8220;she lies like her husband&#8221;   two examples above and just recently the latest spin on her bosnia trip.  The lies won&#8217;t end so why even elect a person like that to president,  woman or not.  </p>
<p>I would vote for Rice in a heartbeat and the world would get a strong black woman as president&#8230;   hummmm just a thought.</p>
<p>Good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin B.</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841&#038;cpage=1#comment-188017</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2841#comment-188017</guid>
		<description>Chris, I just wanted to chime in and say that I enjoyed your intelligent and nuanced perspective in your reply above.

and

Ron, thank you for your perceptive delineation between the two candidates on the issues. This is exactly what I needed to get passed all the hulabaloo I am normal spoon fed by the mainstream dialogue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I just wanted to chime in and say that I enjoyed your intelligent and nuanced perspective in your reply above.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Ron, thank you for your perceptive delineation between the two candidates on the issues. This is exactly what I needed to get passed all the hulabaloo I am normal spoon fed by the mainstream dialogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
