<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kennedys to Bill Clinton: You Are No John Kennedy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170259</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170259</guid>
		<description>The two overlap in the east, and the debate could impact voters in all the Super Tuesday states. I&#039;ll be using a DVR, but lots of people aren&#039;t likely to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two overlap in the east, and the debate could impact voters in all the Super Tuesday states. I&#8217;ll be using a DVR, but lots of people aren&#8217;t likely to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luv</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170258</link>
		<dc:creator>Luv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170258</guid>
		<description>Ron, Lost won&#039;t be on as the same time as the debate in California itself, which is all that matters.

Besides, DVRs are your friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, Lost won&#8217;t be on as the same time as the debate in California itself, which is all that matters.</p>
<p>Besides, DVRs are your friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170130</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170130</guid>
		<description>It was on a November day in 2005, near the end of Barack Obama’s first year in the Senate, when he was asked to deliver a keynote address at a ceremony commemorating the 80th birthday of Robert F. Kennedy.

The invitation was extended by Ethel Kennedy, who at the time referred to Mr. Obama as “our next president.”

“I think he feels it. He feels it just like Bobby did,” Mrs. Kennedy said that day, comparing her late husband’s quest for social justice to Barack Obama’s. “He has the passion in his heart. He’s not selling you. It’s just him.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was on a November day in 2005, near the end of Barack Obama’s first year in the Senate, when he was asked to deliver a keynote address at a ceremony commemorating the 80th birthday of Robert F. Kennedy.</p>
<p>The invitation was extended by Ethel Kennedy, who at the time referred to Mr. Obama as “our next president.”</p>
<p>“I think he feels it. He feels it just like Bobby did,” Mrs. Kennedy said that day, comparing her late husband’s quest for social justice to Barack Obama’s. “He has the passion in his heart. He’s not selling you. It’s just him.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170128</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170128</guid>
		<description>I was wondering about that. Is there a particular reason that Kennedy would be influential among Hispanics beyond his general position in the party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering about that. Is there a particular reason that Kennedy would be influential among Hispanics beyond his general position in the party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plum</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170119</link>
		<dc:creator>plum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170119</guid>
		<description>Remember how badly Obama did with Hispanics in NV? Kennedy is widely respected by Hispanics and is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/01/ted_kennedy_end.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;going to stump&lt;/a&gt; for Obama:

&lt;i&gt;Kennedy plans to campaign actively for Obama, an aide said, and will focus particularly among Hispanics and labor union members, who are important voting blocks in several Feb. 5 states, including California, New York, New Jersey, Arizona and New Mexico.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how badly Obama did with Hispanics in NV? Kennedy is widely respected by Hispanics and is <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/01/ted_kennedy_end.html" rel="nofollow">going to stump</a> for Obama:</p>
<p><i>Kennedy plans to campaign actively for Obama, an aide said, and will focus particularly among Hispanics and labor union members, who are important voting blocks in several Feb. 5 states, including California, New York, New Jersey, Arizona and New Mexico.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170118</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170118</guid>
		<description>I wish the debate wasn&#039;t competing with the season premier of Lost for television attention on Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the debate wasn&#8217;t competing with the season premier of Lost for television attention on Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luv</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170117</link>
		<dc:creator>Luv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170117</guid>
		<description>I think Thursday&#039;s debate will be ultra-critical for Obama. Now that the Clintons know that the veil has been pulled back on their Atwater/Rove tactics, it may make them hesitate to use it there.

And now that Obama showed he can fight, he knows he doesn&#039;t have to get &quot;in the gutter&quot; with Hillary when she goes there. He can deflect and counter and dismiss. Appear completely presidential and in control and STAY. ON. MESSAGE.

If he crushes her in that debate, Cali may be a lot closer than you think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Thursday&#8217;s debate will be ultra-critical for Obama. Now that the Clintons know that the veil has been pulled back on their Atwater/Rove tactics, it may make them hesitate to use it there.</p>
<p>And now that Obama showed he can fight, he knows he doesn&#8217;t have to get &#8220;in the gutter&#8221; with Hillary when she goes there. He can deflect and counter and dismiss. Appear completely presidential and in control and STAY. ON. MESSAGE.</p>
<p>If he crushes her in that debate, Cali may be a lot closer than you think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170112</guid>
		<description>Fortunately California isn&#039;t winner take all for the Democrats any more. I  expect Clinton to win there, but hopefully Obama will keep it close enough that the state doesn&#039;t give Clinton a significant advantage in delegates. 

It is interesting that the vast majority of Senators who have endorsed a candidate have endorsed Obama and not Clinton. Perhaps her fellow Senators aren&#039;t all that enthusiastic about her and just maybe Feinstein or Boxer will decide against making an endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately California isn&#8217;t winner take all for the Democrats any more. I  expect Clinton to win there, but hopefully Obama will keep it close enough that the state doesn&#8217;t give Clinton a significant advantage in delegates. </p>
<p>It is interesting that the vast majority of Senators who have endorsed a candidate have endorsed Obama and not Clinton. Perhaps her fellow Senators aren&#8217;t all that enthusiastic about her and just maybe Feinstein or Boxer will decide against making an endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170104</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170104</guid>
		<description>Massachusetts will go to Obama!

Remember, for many of us on the left, the Kennedys, particularly John F. Kennedy, hold a mythical place in our lives and in our heart.

But expect the California senators, DiFi and Boxer to now come out for Hillary. California is solidly Clintonland which means Barack will have to keep racking up delegate victories in smaller and medium sized states to offset the huge Golden State delegate prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts will go to Obama!</p>
<p>Remember, for many of us on the left, the Kennedys, particularly John F. Kennedy, hold a mythical place in our lives and in our heart.</p>
<p>But expect the California senators, DiFi and Boxer to now come out for Hillary. California is solidly Clintonland which means Barack will have to keep racking up delegate victories in smaller and medium sized states to offset the huge Golden State delegate prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luv</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792&#038;cpage=1#comment-170090</link>
		<dc:creator>Luv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2792#comment-170090</guid>
		<description>DING!

Kennedy&#039;s endorsement gives &quot;permission&quot; to other skittish Senators, Congressmen and Governors who are SICK of the Clintons and their lording over the party to go with Obama.

It is simply the bell tolling...for the Clintons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DING!</p>
<p>Kennedy&#8217;s endorsement gives &#8220;permission&#8221; to other skittish Senators, Congressmen and Governors who are SICK of the Clintons and their lording over the party to go with Obama.</p>
<p>It is simply the bell tolling&#8230;for the Clintons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
