<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton Loses Supporter to Obama In Response To Clinton Smear Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Values &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clinton Campaign Continues War of Distortion in Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-186844</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Values &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clinton Campaign Continues War of Distortion in Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-186844</guid>
		<description>[...] which were totally misleading regarding Obama’s positions on issues such as Social Security, abortion rights, Iraq, and health care. Clinton’s distortions on abortion rights led Lorna Brett Howard, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which were totally misleading regarding Obama’s positions on issues such as Social Security, abortion rights, Iraq, and health care. Clinton’s distortions on abortion rights led Lorna Brett Howard, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-186369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-186369</guid>
		<description>Obama has little Washington experience--but almost as much as Clinton. Beyond Washington Obama has far more experience than Clinton. This includes more total years of legislative experience, experience teaching Constitutional law, and experience as a community organizer. 

Thanks to his experience teaching Constitutional law, we don&#039;t see Obama supporting a ban on flag burning or waging a campaign to censor video games. There are also distinct differences between the two on issues regarding presidential power and secrecy. 

His experience as a community organizer is largely responsible for Obama being able to beat the supposedly invulnerable Clinton machine. In addition, this is probably responsible for him not taking the same top-down approach to solving problems. 

Clinton has been outright lying about Obama&#039;s positions in her mailers and campaign speeches. This is certainly a smear campaign--not &quot;pointing out the obvious.&quot;

As for why so many bloggers support Obama, its largely because he&#039;s the only acceptable non-Clinton candidate. He is the only option which isn&#039;t essentially a third term for George Bush&#039;s style of government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has little Washington experience&#8211;but almost as much as Clinton. Beyond Washington Obama has far more experience than Clinton. This includes more total years of legislative experience, experience teaching Constitutional law, and experience as a community organizer. </p>
<p>Thanks to his experience teaching Constitutional law, we don&#8217;t see Obama supporting a ban on flag burning or waging a campaign to censor video games. There are also distinct differences between the two on issues regarding presidential power and secrecy. </p>
<p>His experience as a community organizer is largely responsible for Obama being able to beat the supposedly invulnerable Clinton machine. In addition, this is probably responsible for him not taking the same top-down approach to solving problems. </p>
<p>Clinton has been outright lying about Obama&#8217;s positions in her mailers and campaign speeches. This is certainly a smear campaign&#8211;not &#8220;pointing out the obvious.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for why so many bloggers support Obama, its largely because he&#8217;s the only acceptable non-Clinton candidate. He is the only option which isn&#8217;t essentially a third term for George Bush&#8217;s style of government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damozel</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-186360</link>
		<dc:creator>Damozel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-186360</guid>
		<description>PS.  I don&#039;t know about disparagement of his voting record, but the reality is that he has little Washington experience, and there&#039;s just no way to turn this into an advantage.  The president has got to do a better job than Bush at understanding the system  The Rezko thing is going to be more of a worry as time advances, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS.  I don&#8217;t know about disparagement of his voting record, but the reality is that he has little Washington experience, and there&#8217;s just no way to turn this into an advantage.  The president has got to do a better job than Bush at understanding the system  The Rezko thing is going to be more of a worry as time advances, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damozel</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-186359</link>
		<dc:creator>Damozel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-186359</guid>
		<description>Here are Clinton&#039;s 35 years of experience:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://bucknakedpolitics.typepad.com/buck_naked_politics/2008/03/clinton-positiv.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;

I remain completely baffled by the passion for Obama.  A mediocre young candidate with a rather cobbled together record gift for impassioned rhetoric---i.e., an ideal candidate (maybe) for the VP spot, but with no background, connections, or special knowledge to fit him for the highest office.  Not to mention a clique of advisers who include some with what I&#039;d call strongly non-progressive values. 

So many bloggers I like and respect are pro-Obama that I feel there must be something behind the image.  I just don&#039;t see it.  I must add that I don&#039;t loooooove Hillary, but I respect her.  

I don&#039;t think she&#039;s running a &#039;smear&#039; campaign, so much as pointing out the obvious.  Obviously those who love Obama will find this difficult to swallow.  But if he gets the nomination---as it looks as if he might---they had best get hardened to it.  The campaign is already starting to self-destruct internally, with his advisers going off the reservation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are Clinton&#8217;s 35 years of experience:</p>
<p><a href="http://bucknakedpolitics.typepad.com/buck_naked_politics/2008/03/clinton-positiv.html" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>
<p>I remain completely baffled by the passion for Obama.  A mediocre young candidate with a rather cobbled together record gift for impassioned rhetoric&#8212;i.e., an ideal candidate (maybe) for the VP spot, but with no background, connections, or special knowledge to fit him for the highest office.  Not to mention a clique of advisers who include some with what I&#8217;d call strongly non-progressive values. </p>
<p>So many bloggers I like and respect are pro-Obama that I feel there must be something behind the image.  I just don&#8217;t see it.  I must add that I don&#8217;t loooooove Hillary, but I respect her.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s running a &#8217;smear&#8217; campaign, so much as pointing out the obvious.  Obviously those who love Obama will find this difficult to swallow.  But if he gets the nomination&#8212;as it looks as if he might&#8212;they had best get hardened to it.  The campaign is already starting to self-destruct internally, with his advisers going off the reservation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Record on Bipartisanship and Defending Liberal Principles - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-185181</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Record on Bipartisanship and Defending Liberal Principles - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-185181</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama’s record both in the Illinois legislature and in the Senate is far stronger than as described by Igantius, including measures involving achieving bipartisan support. I previously wrote about Obama’s record here. Ignatius also revives the bogus attacks on Obama for voting present in the Illinois legislature. Members of the Illinois legislature have defended Obama’s record as noted here. I also had more on this issue here. An op-ed at The Chicago Tribune has argued that this disparagement of Obama’s voting record doesn’t hold up. Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, changed her support from Clinton to Obama after seeing how Clinton was distorting Obama’s record. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama’s record both in the Illinois legislature and in the Senate is far stronger than as described by Igantius, including measures involving achieving bipartisan support. I previously wrote about Obama’s record here. Ignatius also revives the bogus attacks on Obama for voting present in the Illinois legislature. Members of the Illinois legislature have defended Obama’s record as noted here. I also had more on this issue here. An op-ed at The Chicago Tribune has argued that this disparagement of Obama’s voting record doesn’t hold up. Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, changed her support from Clinton to Obama after seeing how Clinton was distorting Obama’s record. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Claims Obama Using Her Own Tactics - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-181391</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Claims Obama Using Her Own Tactics - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-181391</guid>
		<description>[...] In contrast, Clinton has sent out mailers which were totally misleading regarding Obama’s positions on issues such as Social Security, abortion rights, Iraq, and health care. Clinton’s distortions on abortion rights led Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, to drop her support for Clinton and back Obama. Clinton has also raised bogus charges such on plagiarism, distorted the meaning of voting present in the Illinois legislature, and distorting Obama’s references to Ronald Reagan in an interview. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast, Clinton has sent out mailers which were totally misleading regarding Obama’s positions on issues such as Social Security, abortion rights, Iraq, and health care. Clinton’s distortions on abortion rights led Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, to drop her support for Clinton and back Obama. Clinton has also raised bogus charges such on plagiarism, distorted the meaning of voting present in the Illinois legislature, and distorting Obama’s references to Ronald Reagan in an interview. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Krugman Hates Hate, and Obama, and Obama Supporters - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-181386</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Krugman Hates Hate, and Obama, and Obama Supporters - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-181386</guid>
		<description>[...] While both Clinton and Obama support abortion rights, Clinton again resorted to distorting Obama’s record. This led Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, to drop her support for Clinton and back Obama. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While both Clinton and Obama support abortion rights, Clinton again resorted to distorting Obama’s record. This led Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, to drop her support for Clinton and back Obama. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intolerance And The Derailing of Health Care Reform - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-180120</link>
		<dc:creator>Intolerance And The Derailing of Health Care Reform - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-180120</guid>
		<description>[...] Whether there are mandates is a matter of opinion, but regardless of where one stands the implication being made by the Clinton campaign that people will involuntarily be left out is untrue. The Clinton attack that Obama is being dishonest in calling his plan universal is also itself dishonest if they consider Clinton’s plan to be universal. Incidentally, mailers like this have become quite common this election year. They include mailers which lied about Obama’s position on Social Security and mailers which distorted Obama’s views on abortion rights leading Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, to drop her support for Clinton and back Obama. I hope everyone has checked out the videos from Howard and why she supports Obama. Another video everyone should see which compares the two candidates was made by Lawrence Lessig, with both video and transcript here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whether there are mandates is a matter of opinion, but regardless of where one stands the implication being made by the Clinton campaign that people will involuntarily be left out is untrue. The Clinton attack that Obama is being dishonest in calling his plan universal is also itself dishonest if they consider Clinton’s plan to be universal. Incidentally, mailers like this have become quite common this election year. They include mailers which lied about Obama’s position on Social Security and mailers which distorted Obama’s views on abortion rights leading Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW, to drop her support for Clinton and back Obama. I hope everyone has checked out the videos from Howard and why she supports Obama. Another video everyone should see which compares the two candidates was made by Lawrence Lessig, with both video and transcript here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Campaign Still Using Dishonest Mailers - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-174963</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Campaign Still Using Dishonest Mailers - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-174963</guid>
		<description>[...] After Iowa and New Hampshire there was a lot of talk about how Clinton was using dishonest mailers which distort Obama’s positions on Social Security and abortion rights in order to pick up support. Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW (National Organization of Women), changed her support from Clinton to Obama after she found that Hillary Clinton was lying about Obama’s record on choice. She makes the case for supporting Obama in these videos. Clinton has continued using this type of dishonest tactic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After Iowa and New Hampshire there was a lot of talk about how Clinton was using dishonest mailers which distort Obama’s positions on Social Security and abortion rights in order to pick up support. Lorna Brett Howard, the former President of Chicago NOW (National Organization of Women), changed her support from Clinton to Obama after she found that Hillary Clinton was lying about Obama’s record on choice. She makes the case for supporting Obama in these videos. Clinton has continued using this type of dishonest tactic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pettiness of Clinton Supporters - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-171079</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pettiness of Clinton Supporters - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-171079</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments The Pettiness of Clinton Supporters - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought on Hillary Clinton Jumps the SharkClinton Loses Supporter to Obama In Response To Clinton SmearCampaign - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought on There She Goes Again (Hillary Clinton vs. the Truth)Sean C Higgins on Worst President Ever Contest ContinuesSean C Higgins on USA Today Founder: Bush Worst President Everplum on Obama Picks Up Support of Super Delegate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments The Pettiness of Clinton Supporters &#8211; Liberal Values &#8211; Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought on Hillary Clinton Jumps the SharkClinton Loses Supporter to Obama In Response To Clinton SmearCampaign &#8211; Liberal Values &#8211; Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought on There She Goes Again (Hillary Clinton vs. the Truth)Sean C Higgins on Worst President Ever Contest ContinuesSean C Higgins on USA Today Founder: Bush Worst President Everplum on Obama Picks Up Support of Super Delegate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C Higgins</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-169160</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-169160</guid>
		<description>I Hear Senator Clinton say she has 35 Years experience.  Where is this experience?  The last time I checked Sen. Clinton has only held public office less than 5 years.  How is it that Sen. Clinton tries to take credit for things accomplished under her husbands adminstration?  As for the former president who states Sen. Obama is a fairy tale.  I respond in his own statement.  &quot;I smoked it but I did not inhale&quot;.  NOW WHOSE LIVING IN A FAIRY TALE!!!  The Clinton&#039;s played the race card because they are the only ones that can benefit from seeing Sen. Obama as ONLY A Black Candidate.  In essence VOTER SURPRESSION is what they seek to accomplish.  In simple terms they think that black people will possibly see that Sen. Obama cannot not win as a Black man seeking the presidency and not VOTE!!!

The former president should not campaign for his wife.  There is a code of conduct that former presidents should adhere to.  The former president Bush watched his son run for office and yet we got no campaigning or no ill words.  Former president Clinton over stepped his boundaries.
Lastly,  Black America should WAKE UP!!!  Bill Clinton the last time I checked Was A WHITE MALE!!!  Who during his time in office never really did anything extraordinary to help black people.  So why is it that some in leadership think He was the first black president.  Absolutely CRAZY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Hear Senator Clinton say she has 35 Years experience.  Where is this experience?  The last time I checked Sen. Clinton has only held public office less than 5 years.  How is it that Sen. Clinton tries to take credit for things accomplished under her husbands adminstration?  As for the former president who states Sen. Obama is a fairy tale.  I respond in his own statement.  &#8220;I smoked it but I did not inhale&#8221;.  NOW WHOSE LIVING IN A FAIRY TALE!!!  The Clinton&#8217;s played the race card because they are the only ones that can benefit from seeing Sen. Obama as ONLY A Black Candidate.  In essence VOTER SURPRESSION is what they seek to accomplish.  In simple terms they think that black people will possibly see that Sen. Obama cannot not win as a Black man seeking the presidency and not VOTE!!!</p>
<p>The former president should not campaign for his wife.  There is a code of conduct that former presidents should adhere to.  The former president Bush watched his son run for office and yet we got no campaigning or no ill words.  Former president Clinton over stepped his boundaries.<br />
Lastly,  Black America should WAKE UP!!!  Bill Clinton the last time I checked Was A WHITE MALE!!!  Who during his time in office never really did anything extraordinary to help black people.  So why is it that some in leadership think He was the first black president.  Absolutely CRAZY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schaeffer</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-169116</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schaeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-169116</guid>
		<description>There was a time I felt i could have voted for Hillary if she won the nomination. My thoughts were always with Edwards and Obama, the most honest and electable of the Democrats. I did believe that even if they lost to Hillary I could support her, but no longer. Looking at how she runs her campaign its like another round of Bush and Rove. On top of that she is the least likley to beat any republican candidate. Guess i will be staying home for the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time I felt i could have voted for Hillary if she won the nomination. My thoughts were always with Edwards and Obama, the most honest and electable of the Democrats. I did believe that even if they lost to Hillary I could support her, but no longer. Looking at how she runs her campaign its like another round of Bush and Rove. On top of that she is the least likley to beat any republican candidate. Guess i will be staying home for the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley Lington</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-169102</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley Lington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-169102</guid>
		<description>I have always respected both Clinton and Obama and I really do think either of them would be great at the White House. However, somehow, and not unconnected with the Clinton-style campaign, I feel Obama is a better candidate. A Clinton presidency would reopen old wounds and sharpen the divisions among Americans.

Be smart; go for one who can bring Americans together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always respected both Clinton and Obama and I really do think either of them would be great at the White House. However, somehow, and not unconnected with the Clinton-style campaign, I feel Obama is a better candidate. A Clinton presidency would reopen old wounds and sharpen the divisions among Americans.</p>
<p>Be smart; go for one who can bring Americans together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-169100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-169100</guid>
		<description>Madison,

Resorting to such smear campaigns would make the Democratic candidate become just like the Republican. We don&#039;t beat the Republicans by being like them. There&#039;s no need to resort to a smear campaign when Obama could campaign on the real differences.

Someone who lies like Hillary during the campaign will lie once in office, and will not win the respect of the world.

Obama has better plans than Clinton to solve our problems without bringing this type of dishonesty to the White House. 

Clinton&#039;s experience doesn&#039;t say much for her as she has been wrong so often. She has been wrong in her approach to health care, wrong in her support for the war, wrong in her pandering to the right wing, and wrong in her nanny state philosophy of government. 

Besides, how do you know what she will do once in office? She&#039;s shown herself to be a liar, and therefore we cannot trust what she says. We don&#039;t really know what she will do once in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madison,</p>
<p>Resorting to such smear campaigns would make the Democratic candidate become just like the Republican. We don&#8217;t beat the Republicans by being like them. There&#8217;s no need to resort to a smear campaign when Obama could campaign on the real differences.</p>
<p>Someone who lies like Hillary during the campaign will lie once in office, and will not win the respect of the world.</p>
<p>Obama has better plans than Clinton to solve our problems without bringing this type of dishonesty to the White House. </p>
<p>Clinton&#8217;s experience doesn&#8217;t say much for her as she has been wrong so often. She has been wrong in her approach to health care, wrong in her support for the war, wrong in her pandering to the right wing, and wrong in her nanny state philosophy of government. </p>
<p>Besides, how do you know what she will do once in office? She&#8217;s shown herself to be a liar, and therefore we cannot trust what she says. We don&#8217;t really know what she will do once in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-169036</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2772#comment-169036</guid>
		<description>Obama is very honest and determined to bring a change.What I don&#039;t like is how he&#039;s been unnecessarily attacked by the Clintons just to win the White house.It is unfair.Before,I used to respect and admire the Clintons but their smear campaign attitude in the primaries has put me off. America needs Obama now more than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is very honest and determined to bring a change.What I don&#8217;t like is how he&#8217;s been unnecessarily attacked by the Clintons just to win the White house.It is unfair.Before,I used to respect and admire the Clintons but their smear campaign attitude in the primaries has put me off. America needs Obama now more than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
