<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Provides Further Information on Potential Independent Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bloomberg, Centrist Democrat? - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619&#038;cpage=1#comment-160210</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bloomberg, Centrist Democrat? - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619#comment-160210</guid>
		<description>[...] The New York Times looks at Michael Bloomberg’s views and find that he falls right in the middle. Middle of the Democratic Party that is. Many have gone ballistic over the upcoming bipartisan meeting have centered their attacks on a straw man argument that then are all supporters of a mushy center position on all issues. This article proves they are wrong but hasn’t ended the attacks. Greg Sargent, who is emerging as one of the leading Bloomberg-bashers, calls Bloomberg’s calls for “post-partisanship” “a self-serving, attention-seeking stunt.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New York Times looks at Michael Bloomberg’s views and find that he falls right in the middle. Middle of the Democratic Party that is. Many have gone ballistic over the upcoming bipartisan meeting have centered their attacks on a straw man argument that then are all supporters of a mushy center position on all issues. This article proves they are wrong but hasn’t ended the attacks. Greg Sargent, who is emerging as one of the leading Bloomberg-bashers, calls Bloomberg’s calls for “post-partisanship” “a self-serving, attention-seeking stunt.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Listen To The Moderates - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619&#038;cpage=1#comment-159796</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Listen To The Moderates - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619#comment-159796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] “Don’t even think of listening to what those centrists have to say” is the message which keeps coming from parts of the blogosphere. I continue to be amazed by vitriol expressed  regarding the upcoming meeting which includes Michael Bloomberg and a number of both Democrats and Republicans. Via The Carpetbagger Report I read of Greg Sargent’s opposition to the very idea of anyone paying attention to them. Bloomberg and others get attention because there is a very real sense among many people that neither party represents them. This group very well might not be any better, but I’m willing to listen to what they have to say.I’m far more annoyed by the attitude of people like Greg Sargent who go out of their way to attack them before the meeting has even taken place. It is quite premature to claim they have nothing to say before they have even met. [...]
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Don’t even think of listening to what those centrists have to say” is the message which keeps coming from parts of the blogosphere. I continue to be amazed by vitriol expressed  regarding the upcoming meeting which includes Michael Bloomberg and a number of both Democrats and Republicans. Via The Carpetbagger Report I read of Greg Sargent’s opposition to the very idea of anyone paying attention to them. Bloomberg and others get attention because there is a very real sense among many people that neither party represents them. This group very well might not be any better, but I’m willing to listen to what they have to say.I’m far more annoyed by the attitude of people like Greg Sargent who go out of their way to attack them before the meeting has even taken place. It is quite premature to claim they have nothing to say before they have even met. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bloomberg for President</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619&#038;cpage=1#comment-157908</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bloomberg for President</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2619#comment-157908</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks for posting the list of sponsors in full. Just what I was googling for.

Best regards,
Chris

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.RunMikeRun.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.RunMikeRun.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks for posting the list of sponsors in full. Just what I was googling for.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Chris</p>
<p><a href="http://www.RunMikeRun.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.RunMikeRun.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
