There’s a dual problem. I’m also not so certain about how masterful a politician Clinton is, and even if she is masterful she is so frequently in error in what she pursues.

Whaaaat? surely they cannot be claiming that Hillary is a masterful politician at manuering needed legislation through Congress, are they? Hillary has not once passed any legislation through Congress that was needed, her one attempt at health care was a colossal failure and even worse is that she has never been a masterful politician ever! She is a brawler. So umcompromising that folks find her to be divisive. Please.

the case for Obama in the Clinton vs. Obama discussion as a bank shot versus a straight shot in pool. Success is less certain with a bank shot, but the gamble (in this case for a more cohesive, hopeful country) might be worth

this is another poor analogy, while there is more risk with the bank shot it also requires GREATER SKILL, just the right touch! It is a physics trajectory…and requires far more ability and deft ball handling. As such, a bank shot is not a gamble when the person shooting is the consumate athlete! Obama is an extraordinary politician and he would bring the country together, no mattter how many straight shots HRClinton takes and misses!

Even though HRClinton takes the less risky shot, she doesn’t SCORE! So who cares if the shot has a higher percentage?

Hillary has had everything going for her, the Clinton machine, nasty Muslim email smears, drug dealing smears, kindergaren cop bashing trashing and she still is unable to beat a ROOKIE in his first time out on the national scene despite all her claims of being the toughest candidate and the one able to handle the GOP!!

This endorsement was a travesty and bought by the Clintons.

UGH!!!