<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckabee Called for Taking This Nation Back for Christ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2494</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:01:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2494&#038;cpage=1#comment-148308</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2494#comment-148308</guid>
		<description>&quot;the virtue of the people is dependent on morality, and that morality is dependent on religion.&quot;

Just one tiny problem: religious voters in American life since 1976 (when the so-called New Right first made its presence known) increasingly have been opposed to true morality. Falwell is a good case in point, when justice for African Americans was the issue, he was opposed to Christians in politics. Fortunately, the vast majority of churches in the mid-west were not in agreement, and they became one of the important blocks of voters that pressured their representatives in Congress to support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the voting rights bill of 1965. On the other hand, when religious bigotry, militarism, homophobia, and anti-feminism emerged as viable political issues, Falwell advocated the rush of evangelicals into politics. Both the American polity and American religion have been damaged beyond recognition by the immorality of the New Right&#039;s agenda. Restoring morality to American policy appears more likely when the most openly religious lose all chance of election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the virtue of the people is dependent on morality, and that morality is dependent on religion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just one tiny problem: religious voters in American life since 1976 (when the so-called New Right first made its presence known) increasingly have been opposed to true morality. Falwell is a good case in point, when justice for African Americans was the issue, he was opposed to Christians in politics. Fortunately, the vast majority of churches in the mid-west were not in agreement, and they became one of the important blocks of voters that pressured their representatives in Congress to support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the voting rights bill of 1965. On the other hand, when religious bigotry, militarism, homophobia, and anti-feminism emerged as viable political issues, Falwell advocated the rush of evangelicals into politics. Both the American polity and American religion have been damaged beyond recognition by the immorality of the New Right&#8217;s agenda. Restoring morality to American policy appears more likely when the most openly religious lose all chance of election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Step</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2494&#038;cpage=1#comment-148289</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Step</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2494#comment-148289</guid>
		<description>Think about this: the average I.Q. is 100. Which means that overall, one of two people you meet, will fall into those having I.Q.s of either more than or less than 100.  Now, because the I.Q. scale is grounded in a &quot;bell curve&quot; (approaches &quot;0&quot; at both ends of the scale), 3 of 4 people you meet will have an I.Q under 106. This is 66% of the people, the majority. Now then, those under the 106 ranking would not be the brightest.  So, these folks, in their doubts, unsure of what is &quot;the case&quot;, will expectedly look for answeres tp their questions, not in themselves, but in some external authority. They will accept these answers &quot;on faith&quot;. Some, functionally illiterate, are only familiar with one book -- the Bible. Being told, by their local authority, the Preacher, that Jesus is the absolute authority, will now become ready to &quot;bring the nation back to Christ&quot;, and so get answers to their questions.  Ah, what about Roman Catholics? Well, not bible-based, they look to the Pope. He has little to say other than to be &quot;good&quot; and obedient (to the Church). As all organized religions, Evangelical and otherwise, rest upon the peace that authority gives. Huckabee has a great chance of becoming President of a Theocracy.  But what of significance would come about with Huckabee&#039;s Presidency? Nothing. Lots of the usual Bible-thumping, but nothing more. I won&#039;t vote for the creep, but many will. I get along with my God -- who, incidentally, is not that &quot;thin-skinned and short-tempered&quot; war God, Jehovah (Huckabee&#039;s favorite -- the Father of Jesus). Try to find your own God. Tell Huckabee and John Hagee to mind their own business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about this: the average I.Q. is 100. Which means that overall, one of two people you meet, will fall into those having I.Q.s of either more than or less than 100.  Now, because the I.Q. scale is grounded in a &#8220;bell curve&#8221; (approaches &#8220;0&#8243; at both ends of the scale), 3 of 4 people you meet will have an I.Q under 106. This is 66% of the people, the majority. Now then, those under the 106 ranking would not be the brightest.  So, these folks, in their doubts, unsure of what is &#8220;the case&#8221;, will expectedly look for answeres tp their questions, not in themselves, but in some external authority. They will accept these answers &#8220;on faith&#8221;. Some, functionally illiterate, are only familiar with one book &#8212; the Bible. Being told, by their local authority, the Preacher, that Jesus is the absolute authority, will now become ready to &#8220;bring the nation back to Christ&#8221;, and so get answers to their questions.  Ah, what about Roman Catholics? Well, not bible-based, they look to the Pope. He has little to say other than to be &#8220;good&#8221; and obedient (to the Church). As all organized religions, Evangelical and otherwise, rest upon the peace that authority gives. Huckabee has a great chance of becoming President of a Theocracy.  But what of significance would come about with Huckabee&#8217;s Presidency? Nothing. Lots of the usual Bible-thumping, but nothing more. I won&#8217;t vote for the creep, but many will. I get along with my God &#8212; who, incidentally, is not that &#8220;thin-skinned and short-tempered&#8221; war God, Jehovah (Huckabee&#8217;s favorite &#8212; the Father of Jesus). Try to find your own God. Tell Huckabee and John Hagee to mind their own business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
