One can not deny THIS voting record compared to Hillary Clintons.

MILITARY COMMISSIONS. RP NO…..HC YES
PATRIOT ACT 1.. RP NO ……….HC YES
PATRIOT ACT 2. .RP NO ……….HC YES.
IRAQ WAR.. .RP NO………HC YES
WAR WITH IRAN. .RP NO………HC YES.
WIRETAPPING. .RP NO………HC YES
INCREASED AID TO ISRAEL. RP NO…..HC. YES
EMINENT DOMAIN..RP..NO………HC.. NV
NAFTA………RP..NO………..HC..YES
CAFTA………RP..NO………..HC..YES
IMF………..RP..NO………..HC..YES
WORLD BANK….RP..NO………..HC..YES
WTO………..RP..NO………..HC..YES
NORTH AMERICAN UNION..RP..NO…HC..?
NATIONAL ID….RP..NO……….HC..YES
IMMIGRANT DRIVERS LICENSE..RP..NO..HC..YES

Ron will unite this nation, like he has Galveston and no one has anything to be afraid of except the truth.
That is what we need. The truth.
Ron, we love you.

No, the science of embryology is well established. You may wish to reject modern science, but you do not have the right to impose this on others.

“With this you may or may not agree. But if Ron Paul is guided by a similiar philosophy, why would you fault him for it?”

Ron Paul may personally choose any philosophy. He does not have the right to impose these views on others. This is also a violation of the Constitution which Paul falsely claims to be a strict follower of.

“But I have longed for a political leader who would put the Constitution ahead of those fairly new “rights” that have been manufactured in Congress and the courts.”

In some areas Paul deserves credit for defending Constitutional liberties, but he also subscribes to an extremist view of the Constitution which is contrary to the intent of the founding fathers and which denies liberty where it differs from his personal religious views.

But whose opinion is that? Yes, it may be yours, or from a gaggle of scientists, but nonetheless it is just an opinion.

I have thought long and hard, and struggled with the abortion question, and, as a Christian, have decided to let my faith guide me.

All persons have a right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” under the Constitution. So therefore, federal law should exist to protect that right to life. But the question then becomes to whom does that right extend?

Obviously it would include those of us who are out of the womb. But what about those still in the womb? Jesus said, “I knew you when you were in the womb.” He didn’t say “after the second trimester when you had achieved viability.” We just don’t have the answer. And in the absence of a definitive answer we should choose to err on the side of caution and include all fetuses.

With this you may or may not agree. But if Ron Paul is guided by a similiar philosophy, why would you fault him for it?

Ron Paul has faults, just like the rest of us. But I have longed for a political leader who would put the Constitution ahead of those fairly new “rights” that have been manufactured in Congress and the courts. The emphasis on maximizing the freedom of the individual rings true for anyone who spent time on campus during the 60’s, as did I.

We must be on guard against both the radical leftist who would strip you of your rights if need be to enforce his/her social agenda, as well as the neo-con who would just as soon sell your mind, body and soul to the corporate boardroom if it meant putting a dollar in his/her pocket.

After doing a Google search on the topic I see that such claims really are out there. Conspiracy theories involving the Illuminati are bad enough (unless done humorously such as by Robert Anton Wilson). I see that Icke really does claim that the Illuminati is a reptilian race.

This race includes George Bush. Is that why Bush failed to have that National Guard physical?

“I am a Christian Libertarian (it is not a contradiction)”

Nobody says that is a contradiction. Again you confuse secularism with absence of religion or opposition to religion.

“Today it is Secularism and it is declared a religion by the Supreme Court.”

No, secularism is not a religion. Under secularism individuals may believe in any religion, or no religion at all.

“Life is an inalienable right in the Declaration of Independence. Whose God gives that right? It is the Christian God since that was the mindset of the founding fathers.”

Incorrect. Many of the founding fathers were Deists who rejected traditional Christian beliefs. The founding fathers specifically and intentionally did not refer to the Christian God or any other God in the Constitution due to their belief in separation of church and state.

“Abortion is wrong according to the Christian God.”

There is some controversy over that with different Christians having different interpretations. Even if this was true, applying such a belief of a specific religion to law is unconstitutional.

You can be a Christian Libertarian and personally believe abortion is wrong. It is a contradiction with libertarianism if you use the powers of the state to enforce your religious beliefs upon others.

“On the subject of UN. The UN destroys national sovereignty.”

No. Just as individuals can freely associate without losing their identities as individuals, nations can also associate with each other without losing their sovereignty.

“It is impossible to have world peace by the effort of man getting together from various religious background. All religions are at war against Christianity and against each other.”

Nonsense. Some in some religions are at war against those with other religions but there is no general state of war between Christianity and other religions. There is a much stronger argument that the UN has been a tremendous success than a dismal failure. Comparing the warfare of the first half of the 20th century to the second, after the UN was formed, the wars were much more limited and less devastating globally despite the development of nuclear weapons.

I am a Christian Libertarian (it is not a contradiction) and I think that is what Ron Paul is. I do believe in separation of church and state, but not a solid wall. Both institutions are under the rule of God – religion is inescapable since man is incurably religious. The state is not to rule over the church and the church is not to rule over the state. The church is to teach the law of God and the state is the minister of wrath punishing evil doers.

The Constitution by itself is a secular document. But what public religion drives it? It can’t be nothing. Today it is Secularism and it is declared a religion by the Supreme Court.

Life is an inalienable right in the Declaration of Independence. Whose God gives that right? It is the Christian God since that was the mindset of the founding fathers. Abortion is wrong according to the Christian God.

On the subject of UN. The UN destroys national sovereignty. The UN has been a dismal failure. In spite of the UN there has been more wars and more lives lost in the world during the history of UN. It is impossible to have world peace by the effort of man getting together from various religious background. All religions are at war against Christianity and against each other.

Giant lizards? I hadn’t heard of that conspiracy yet.

David Icke peddles that garbage. Saw some dude on a hiphop message board mentioning it awhile back.

Giant lizards? I hadn’t heard of that conspiracy yet. Does it have anything to do with the old TV miniseries and series, V?

On that one, I agree with pulling out. The UN is built on a falsehood, namely that it is ever possible for nation-states to put aside their own interests. They just use it as cover for what they wanted to do anyway, since there inherently cannot be an independent enforcement arm for any conclusions reached. International law itself is impossible.

Remember, deep down these are right wingers, not libertarians.