Comments on: Payment from Paul Campaign to 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist Revealed http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313 Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:16 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: GOP Reports » Blog Archive » Ron Paul Campaign - Payment from Paul Campaign to 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist Revealed http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313&cpage=1#comment-164428 GOP Reports » Blog Archive » Ron Paul Campaign - Payment from Paul Campaign to 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist Revealed Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:01:03 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313#comment-164428 [...] Payment from Paul Campaign to 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist Revealed Following the recent reports that Ron Paul has received the endorsement of the white supremacist organization Stormfront, and now has [...] [...] Payment from Paul Campaign to 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist Revealed Following the recent reports that Ron Paul has received the endorsement of the white supremacist organization Stormfront, and now has [...]

]]> By: One Question About Paul Answered But Many Ties to Conspiracy Theories Remain - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313&cpage=1#comment-131398 One Question About Paul Answered But Many Ties to Conspiracy Theories Remain - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:39:47 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313#comment-131398 <p>[...] Recently I reported on both a contribution from 9/11 conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to Ron Paul and a payment from the Paul campaign to Jones. This raised questions as to why the Paul campaign would be paying money to Jones. The Corner reports that the $1300 payment was a partial refund of Jones’s $2,300 contribution to the Paul campaign. There is no indication as to why this partial refund was paid. This does satisfy resolve the question as to why there would be a payment to Jones, but the questions regarding the connections between Jones and Paul persist. The Corner also reports: [...] </p> [...] Recently I reported on both a contribution from 9/11 conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to Ron Paul and a payment from the Paul campaign to Jones. This raised questions as to why the Paul campaign would be paying money to Jones. The Corner reports that the $1300 payment was a partial refund of Jones’s $2,300 contribution to the Paul campaign. There is no indication as to why this partial refund was paid. This does satisfy resolve the question as to why there would be a payment to Jones, but the questions regarding the connections between Jones and Paul persist. The Corner also reports: [...]

]]> By: Ron Chusid http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313&cpage=1#comment-130726 Ron Chusid Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:43:51 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313#comment-130726 FZappa, You really don't help your candidate when you spam the blogosphere with comments as irrational as this. "Don Black endorsed Bush in 2004." Where is your evidence of such an endorsement? In reality, Bush tried very hard to hide the connection between himself and Black which was found after the 2000 election. Bush was also criticized for this and I doubt that following this Black would have publically endorsed Bush. "By your logic, it does" When you twist the facts and then claim something is by my logic you only destroy your own credibility. "Well, I guess we can’t watch “Two and a Half Men” because Charlie Sheen is a Truther" Irrelevant. Watching someone on a television show has nothing to do with their political beliefs. However the beliefs of a presidential candidate are rather significant in a political race. In other words, we don't care if the star of a sitcom is a wacko, but a presidential candidate is a different matter. "This really is the worst you can find on Ron Paul?" Lines like this even destroy your credibility further. No where does it say this is the worst about Paul. The point is that this is just one problem in a long string of problems which point out a problem. "Then I know he’s going to win." Then you really are a fool. I bet even Paul understands he is running a protest candidacy wtih no chance to win. Not that he ever had a chance, but the more people see of his connections to far right extremists, and the more they see that his views are far more social conservativism than libertarian, the less of a chance he has. FZappa,

You really don’t help your candidate when you spam the blogosphere with comments as irrational as this.

“Don Black endorsed Bush in 2004.”

Where is your evidence of such an endorsement? In reality, Bush tried very hard to hide the connection between himself and Black which was found after the 2000 election. Bush was also criticized for this and I doubt that following this Black would have publically endorsed Bush.

“By your logic, it does”

When you twist the facts and then claim something is by my logic you only destroy your own credibility.

“Well, I guess we can’t watch “Two and a Half Men” because Charlie Sheen is a Truther”

Irrelevant. Watching someone on a television show has nothing to do with their political beliefs. However the beliefs of a presidential candidate are rather significant in a political race. In other words, we don’t care if the star of a sitcom is a wacko, but a presidential candidate is a different matter.
“This really is the worst you can find on Ron Paul?”

Lines like this even destroy your credibility further. No where does it say this is the worst about Paul. The point is that this is just one problem in a long string of problems which point out a problem.

“Then I know he’s going to win.”

Then you really are a fool. I bet even Paul understands he is running a protest candidacy wtih no chance to win.

Not that he ever had a chance, but the more people see of his connections to far right extremists, and the more they see that his views are far more social conservativism than libertarian, the less of a chance he has.

]]> By: FZappa http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313&cpage=1#comment-130065 FZappa Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:20:18 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2313#comment-130065 Chusid, Don Black endorsed Bush in 2004. Bush did not "renounce" him. Does that make Bush a neo-nazi? By your logic, it does. Re Alex Jones: so no one can associate with 9/11 Truthers or they're instantly unacceptable? Well, I guess we can't watch "Two and a Half Men" because Charlie Sheen is a Truther. I guess CBS should "repudiate" Sheen, except that he just won an Emmy and it's one of the most popular shows on TV. This really is the worst you can find on Ron Paul? Then I know he's going to win -- and I suspect you do, too. Chusid,

Don Black endorsed Bush in 2004. Bush did not “renounce” him. Does that make Bush a neo-nazi? By your logic, it does.

Re Alex Jones: so no one can associate with 9/11 Truthers or they’re instantly unacceptable? Well, I guess we can’t watch “Two and a Half Men” because Charlie Sheen is a Truther. I guess CBS should “repudiate” Sheen, except that he just won an Emmy and it’s one of the most popular shows on TV.

This really is the worst you can find on Ron Paul? Then I know he’s going to win — and I suspect you do, too.

]]>