<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edwards To Accept Matching Funds Ending Pretense of Being Most Electable Candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2205</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama Leads in Iowa Poll Among Likely Caucus-Goers - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2205&#038;cpage=1#comment-119494</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Leads in Iowa Poll Among Likely Caucus-Goers - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2205#comment-119494</guid>
		<description>[...] To remain a viable candidate, Edwards must not only reverse his downward trajectory but come back to win decisively. Without a sizable win it is unlikely Edwards would get enough of a bounce to win in New Hampshire, where his populist agenda is not received well as favorably as it is in Iowa. Without an impressive victory, Edwards would also have a difficult time raising enough money to mount a national campaign for the multi-state February 5 primaries, and he is also at a disadvantage from the restrictions due to accepting federal matching funds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To remain a viable candidate, Edwards must not only reverse his downward trajectory but come back to win decisively. Without a sizable win it is unlikely Edwards would get enough of a bounce to win in New Hampshire, where his populist agenda is not received well as favorably as it is in Iowa. Without an impressive victory, Edwards would also have a difficult time raising enough money to mount a national campaign for the multi-state February 5 primaries, and he is also at a disadvantage from the restrictions due to accepting federal matching funds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanGrounds</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2205&#038;cpage=1#comment-118829</link>
		<dc:creator>UrbanGrounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2205#comment-118829</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Edwards Takes the Money...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ordinarily I disagree with just about every single word that comes from either Ollie or Markos &#8212; but I&#8217;m with them on this one. I think Edwards decision to accept the public financing portends the dire state of his campaign.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Edwards Takes the Money&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ordinarily I disagree with just about every single word that comes from either Ollie or Markos &#8212; but I&#8217;m with them on this one. I think Edwards decision to accept the public financing portends the dire state of his campaign.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
