<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astrology is Bunk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: World Net Daily Attacks The Democratic Daily Over Violence and Porn&#8211;What Irony - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797&#038;cpage=1#comment-89702</link>
		<dc:creator>World Net Daily Attacks The Democratic Daily Over Violence and Porn&#8211;What Irony - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797#comment-89702</guid>
		<description>[...] Astrology is Bunk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Astrology is Bunk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797&#038;cpage=1#comment-89620</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797#comment-89620</guid>
		<description>There was plenty of reason for someone to predict either Bush or Kerry winning in 2004 without using astrology (and I also recall seeing a prediction from another astrolger that Kerry would win). Predicting a Ron Paul victory is certainly more daring than predicting Bush in 2004. 

It wouldn&#039;t prove a thing about astrology, but being right on this prediction would be notable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was plenty of reason for someone to predict either Bush or Kerry winning in 2004 without using astrology (and I also recall seeing a prediction from another astrolger that Kerry would win). Predicting a Ron Paul victory is certainly more daring than predicting Bush in 2004. </p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t prove a thing about astrology, but being right on this prediction would be notable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granny miller</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797&#038;cpage=1#comment-89612</link>
		<dc:creator>granny miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797#comment-89612</guid>
		<description>Good Morning! 
Astrology is bunk?

Well, there are many couples in India and elsewhere about to be married, who would take exception to your assertion. 
 Not to mention C.G. Jung . 
 Generations of farmers and simple folk who have yet to be divorced from Nature still use astrology every day. 
What do you imagine an almanac is for?

I just left a comment over at The Liberty Papers about this topic in regards to George Stephanopoulos’s interview of Congressman Ron Paul.

Hang on to this comment and debunk it next November.

I’ve been an astrologer for over 25 years and I have called the last 7 elections correctly.

In fact this past Bush/Kerry election was the easiest to interpret. 
I shocked my own husband :-) who felt certain John Kerry would win.
He kept boring me with the &quot;exit polls&quot; and the &quot;experts&quot;. 


Congressman Ron Paul has 6 out of 7 markers that I have used in the past to determine who will win an election.

No other 2008 Presidential candidate currently running has more than 4 markers.
John Edwards may have a 5th, but - I’m not sure.

It is my opinion Ron Paul could easily be the next President of the United States.

In fact I’m willing to stake my reputation on it. 
I wonder if  George Stephanopoulos  will stake his job at ABC on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning!<br />
Astrology is bunk?</p>
<p>Well, there are many couples in India and elsewhere about to be married, who would take exception to your assertion.<br />
 Not to mention C.G. Jung .<br />
 Generations of farmers and simple folk who have yet to be divorced from Nature still use astrology every day.<br />
What do you imagine an almanac is for?</p>
<p>I just left a comment over at The Liberty Papers about this topic in regards to George Stephanopoulos’s interview of Congressman Ron Paul.</p>
<p>Hang on to this comment and debunk it next November.</p>
<p>I’ve been an astrologer for over 25 years and I have called the last 7 elections correctly.</p>
<p>In fact this past Bush/Kerry election was the easiest to interpret.<br />
I shocked my own husband <img src='http://liberalvaluesblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  who felt certain John Kerry would win.<br />
He kept boring me with the &#8220;exit polls&#8221; and the &#8220;experts&#8221;. </p>
<p>Congressman Ron Paul has 6 out of 7 markers that I have used in the past to determine who will win an election.</p>
<p>No other 2008 Presidential candidate currently running has more than 4 markers.<br />
John Edwards may have a 5th, but &#8211; I’m not sure.</p>
<p>It is my opinion Ron Paul could easily be the next President of the United States.</p>
<p>In fact I’m willing to stake my reputation on it.<br />
I wonder if  George Stephanopoulos  will stake his job at ABC on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrology is Bunk, Part 2 - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797&#038;cpage=1#comment-89416</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrology is Bunk, Part 2 - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1797#comment-89416</guid>
		<description>[...] Astrology is Bunk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Astrology is Bunk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
