<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Undecided On 2012 Run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=11089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=11089</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:14:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eclectic Radical</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=11089&#038;cpage=1#comment-227026</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclectic Radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=11089#comment-227026</guid>
		<description>What struck me most about the Ron Paul candicacy was the way that establishment neoconservatism (from Ann Coulter to the Republican talking heads on CNN) dismissed Paul as &#039;not even being a real Republican&#039; because of his dissent from neoconservatives on foreign policy. Despite his opposition to the current neoconservative Republican establishment on a range of economic and foreign policy issues, Paul has a lot more in common with &#039;classic&#039; paleoconservatives of the Pat Buchanan stripe than with libertarians. That is a very Republican ideological group, claiming to be directly derived from Robert Taft small government isolationism and certainly resembling it in many ways. Entirely Republican and not &#039;libertarian&#039; at all.
 
Indeed, in his day, Robert Taft&#039;s nickname was &#039;Mr. Republican.&#039; It just goes to show how far the modern neoconservative corporate/imperialist view of the world has diverged from &#039;classical conservatism.&#039;
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What struck me most about the Ron Paul candicacy was the way that establishment neoconservatism (from Ann Coulter to the Republican talking heads on CNN) dismissed Paul as &#8216;not even being a real Republican&#8217; because of his dissent from neoconservatives on foreign policy. Despite his opposition to the current neoconservative Republican establishment on a range of economic and foreign policy issues, Paul has a lot more in common with &#8216;classic&#8217; paleoconservatives of the Pat Buchanan stripe than with libertarians. That is a very Republican ideological group, claiming to be directly derived from Robert Taft small government isolationism and certainly resembling it in many ways. Entirely Republican and not &#8216;libertarian&#8217; at all.<br />
 <br />
Indeed, in his day, Robert Taft&#8217;s nickname was &#8216;Mr. Republican.&#8217; It just goes to show how far the modern neoconservative corporate/imperialist view of the world has diverged from &#8216;classical conservatism.&#8217;<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllenS</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=11089&#038;cpage=1#comment-227018</link>
		<dc:creator>AllenS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=11089#comment-227018</guid>
		<description>Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
