Comments on: Triple X Home Movie Leads to Settlement of Prejean Suit http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939 Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:01:19 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Carrie Prejean in the nude, and the news again - rightofcourse.com http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226506 Carrie Prejean in the nude, and the news again - rightofcourse.com Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:57:07 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226506 [...] her contract by having the photos taken.  Now, it turns out Carrie is dropping her lawsuit.  Carrie is dropping her suit due to a recently exposed sex tape.  CNN says Carrie Prejean is alone in the sex tape, but it was too racy even for TMZ to post, so [...] [...] her contract by having the photos taken.  Now, it turns out Carrie is dropping her lawsuit.  Carrie is dropping her suit due to a recently exposed sex tape.  CNN says Carrie Prejean is alone in the sex tape, but it was too racy even for TMZ to post, so [...]

]]> By: uglywolf http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226436 uglywolf Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:51:20 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226436 Why in the hell would this women get implants? Rhetorical Why in the hell would this women get implants? Rhetorical

]]> By: freepatriot http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226434 freepatriot Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:03:53 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226434 here's a short transcript   Prejean: they defamed me by revealing my brest implants Miss California contest : she defreauded us by appearing in a porno flick Prejean: never mind your honor, forget I evwer said anything Miss California contest :come on judge, let us show a jury this porno flick as a part of the evidence ...   ROTFLMAO   hey carrie, karma is a bitch, ain't it ???   here’s a short transcript
 
Prejean: they defamed me by revealing my brest implants
Miss California contest : she defreauded us by appearing in a porno flick
Prejean: never mind your honor, forget I evwer said anything
Miss California contest :come on judge, let us show a jury this porno flick as a part of the evidence …
 
ROTFLMAO
 
hey carrie, karma is a bitch, ain’t it ???
 

]]> By: Supremecourtjester http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226429 Supremecourtjester Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:07:41 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226429 She sued the pagent for firing her, and the pagent alleged that she broke the contract in several ways, one of which is that there were topless stills of her.  I saw the actual contract online somewhere, although I am currently unable to retrieve it.  She specifically stated under oath in the contract that there were no topless, nude or x rated types of photographs of her in existance.  Therefore, her perjury beccomes relevant to the issues in her suit. She sued the pagent for firing her, and the pagent alleged that she broke the contract in several ways, one of which is that there were topless stills of her.  I saw the actual contract online somewhere, although I am currently unable to retrieve it.  She specifically stated under oath in the contract that there were no topless, nude or x rated types of photographs of her in existance.  Therefore, her perjury beccomes relevant to the issues in her suit.

]]> By: Seriously, Why do Conservatives embrace people like this? | Political Byline http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226426 Seriously, Why do Conservatives embrace people like this? | Political Byline Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:31:24 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226426 [...] from all sides of the political aisle: Liberal Values, Tayor Marsh, Alan Colmes’ Liberaland, Don Surber, News Hounds, Raw Story, Pam’s House [...] [...] from all sides of the political aisle: Liberal Values, Tayor Marsh, Alan Colmes’ Liberaland, Don Surber, News Hounds, Raw Story, Pam’s House [...]

]]> By: Ron Chusid http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226425 Ron Chusid Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:30:13 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226425 StringonaStick, She was asked about her view on gay marriage at the pageant and answering the question should not disqualify her even if we disagree with her. Her political activities following the pageant are a different matter. Even then the more serious problem is not that she expressed political views but that she allowed attending political events to interfere with her duties. I got the impression that when the racy pictures first surfaced this could have disqualified her but the decision was made to allow her to keep her crown. I agreed with this decision considering how relatively tame the pictures are by today's standards (and excluding her political views from the decision). Having XXX rated films out there is clearly a far more serious matter than the pictures. StringonaStick,

She was asked about her view on gay marriage at the pageant and answering the question should not disqualify her even if we disagree with her. Her political activities following the pageant are a different matter. Even then the more serious problem is not that she expressed political views but that she allowed attending political events to interfere with her duties.

I got the impression that when the racy pictures first surfaced this could have disqualified her but the decision was made to allow her to keep her crown. I agreed with this decision considering how relatively tame the pictures are by today’s standards (and excluding her political views from the decision). Having XXX rated films out there is clearly a far more serious matter than the pictures.

]]> By: Tweets that mention » Triple X Home Movie Leads to Settlement of Prejean Suit Liberal Values -- Topsy.com http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226423 Tweets that mention » Triple X Home Movie Leads to Settlement of Prejean Suit Liberal Values -- Topsy.com Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:23:10 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226423 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kevin Kefgen, Mike Kelly. Mike Kelly said: » Triple X Home Movie Leads to Settlement of Prejean Suit Liberal ... http://bit.ly/2SUInf [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kevin Kefgen, Mike Kelly. Mike Kelly said: » Triple X Home Movie Leads to Settlement of Prejean Suit Liberal … http://bit.ly/2SUInf [...]

]]> By: Kevin Kefgen http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226437 Kevin Kefgen Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:22:37 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226437 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">http://is.gd/4O2xT Good! Prejean gets nothing in her suit against Ms. America.</span></span> http://is.gd/4O2xT Good! Prejean gets nothing in her suit against Ms. America.

]]> By: StringonaStick http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226422 StringonaStick Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:20:43 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226422 Yes, she certainly had the right to express her views, <em>but as a private citizen</em>.  The Miss American schtick is a job that one is supposed to perform without sidetrips into politics; its in the contract  (unless they are contest-approved, boss-approved politics, causes, etc, because the Miss America title is a JOB you win, and it comes with rules for performance of that job, just like any job).  What is also in the contract is there can be no pre-existing film, video, etc that would, in the eyes of the Miss America corporate structure, make the winner appear to be less than the purest flower of 'Merikan viginity; this video made the pretense of her being qualified (according to contest rules) to serve as Miss America totally moot.   Others have lost their MA crown for having some racy photos show up later; this isn't a first time event as much as Princess Plastic Boobies wants to act like it is.  It's a job title that comes with a rule book, and she had broken the qualification rules before she entered the contest, free silicone or not.  The hypocracy and "poor persecuted by teh gays Christian me" crap was the sideshow by yet another pretty republican grifter.  Yes, she certainly had the right to express her views, but as a private citizen.  The Miss American schtick is a job that one is supposed to perform without sidetrips into politics; its in the contract  (unless they are contest-approved, boss-approved politics, causes, etc, because the Miss America title is a JOB you win, and it comes with rules for performance of that job, just like any job).  What is also in the contract is there can be no pre-existing film, video, etc that would, in the eyes of the Miss America corporate structure, make the winner appear to be less than the purest flower of ‘Merikan viginity; this video made the pretense of her being qualified (according to contest rules) to serve as Miss America totally moot.   Others have lost their MA crown for having some racy photos show up later; this isn’t a first time event as much as Princess Plastic Boobies wants to act like it is. 

It’s a job title that comes with a rule book, and she had broken the qualification rules before she entered the contest, free silicone or not.  The hypocracy and “poor persecuted by teh gays Christian me” crap was the sideshow by yet another pretty republican grifter. 

]]> By: Miss_lola http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226418 Miss_lola Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:42:54 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226418 Yeah, if she was suing for breach of contract (taking her crown away for no good reason), the sex tape proves that she didn't meet the 'moral clauses' of the pageant, should never have had the crown, and therefore breached the contract first...meaning that she had no case against them.  Suitable use of the tape, IMO. Yeah, if she was suing for breach of contract (taking her crown away for no good reason), the sex tape proves that she didn’t meet the ‘moral clauses’ of the pageant, should never have had the crown, and therefore breached the contract first…meaning that she had no case against them.  Suitable use of the tape, IMO.

]]> By: jeff http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226415 jeff Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:12:55 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226415 the legal pricinple involved isn't blackmail, it's duress. But because the tape is relevant to the issues in the case (moral turpitude clause in the pageant rules), there's no duress here. Good outcome. the legal pricinple involved isn’t blackmail, it’s duress. But because the tape is relevant to the issues in the case (moral turpitude clause in the pageant rules), there’s no duress here.

Good outcome.

]]> By: Ron Chusid http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226412 Ron Chusid Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:33:50 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226412 rickstersherpa, You may be right here and I might have to reverse the view in my previous comment. She was fired because of not meeting contractual obligations to attend events. From that perspective the xxx video would be irrelevant. However you are probably correct that this tape also violates terms of her contract. Even if she had a case (which I doubt) based upon refuting the argument that she failed to meet her obligations, it sounds like the tape might also present reason to take back her crown. In response to other comments, while I disagree with her attacks on gay marriage and question the consistency of her religious views, these should not be (and it appears were not) reasons for the decision to dump her. When asked about her views on gay marriage she had the right to express her views, even if we do not like her views. rickstersherpa,

You may be right here and I might have to reverse the view in my previous comment. She was fired because of not meeting contractual obligations to attend events. From that perspective the xxx video would be irrelevant. However you are probably correct that this tape also violates terms of her contract. Even if she had a case (which I doubt) based upon refuting the argument that she failed to meet her obligations, it sounds like the tape might also present reason to take back her crown.

In response to other comments, while I disagree with her attacks on gay marriage and question the consistency of her religious views, these should not be (and it appears were not) reasons for the decision to dump her. When asked about her views on gay marriage she had the right to express her views, even if we do not like her views.

]]> By: Capt. Bat Guano http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226411 Capt. Bat Guano Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:17:00 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226411 It's the hypocrisy stupid. Anyone who preaches morality, especially hate and intolerance based morality should stay out of any and all glass houses. Fuck her. It’s the hypocrisy stupid. Anyone who preaches morality, especially hate and intolerance based morality should stay out of any and all glass houses. Fuck her.

]]> By: rickstersherpa http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226410 rickstersherpa Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:10:32 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226410 Just from a legal point view, although it sounds almost like blackmail to show this tape, it is probably directly relevant to the conduct and past behavior clauses pageants put into the contracts they sign with contestants so they won't be embarassed when something like this turns up.  On a personal note, another woman learns that ex-boyfriends are all potentially  scumbags and one should never give them some "erotic" keep sake as it will definitely comeback to  haunt you, especially in the age digital video and the Internet.  Of course the libertine in me enjoys another Biblethumper being caught out in her hypocrisy, but I expect that will just be another part of her redemption talk as she does the Elmber Gantry/Family Reserach Council speaking tour and makes more than a small fortune on it (the secret, forbidden titillation with her looks and sordid past I expect will only enhance the take).        Just from a legal point view, although it sounds almost like blackmail to show this tape, it is probably directly relevant to the conduct and past behavior clauses pageants put into the contracts they sign with contestants so they won’t be embarassed when something like this turns up.  On a personal note, another woman learns that ex-boyfriends are all potentially  scumbags and one should never give them some “erotic” keep sake as it will definitely comeback to  haunt you, especially in the age digital video and the Internet. 

Of course the libertine in me enjoys another Biblethumper being caught out in her hypocrisy, but I expect that will just be another part of her redemption talk as she does the Elmber Gantry/Family Reserach Council speaking tour and makes more than a small fortune on it (the secret, forbidden titillation with her looks and sordid past I expect will only enhance the take).       

]]> By: justawoman http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939&cpage=1#comment-226409 justawoman Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:04:49 +0000 http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=10939#comment-226409 She lied about who she really was and is . That's where her problem lies. I'm glad she got nothing as she stood and lied her butt off. She called upon God and help to destroy Equal rights for American citizens. ya see republicans it always comes back in a bad way. health insurance reform and Now She lied about who she really was and is . That’s where her problem lies. I’m glad she got nothing as she stood and lied her butt off. She called upon God and help to destroy Equal rights for American citizens. ya see republicans it always comes back in a bad way.

health insurance reform and Now

]]>