Republican Electoral Gains Result In Greater Restrictions On Reproductive Rights

abortion restrictions

Many Republicans won spots in state governments on campaigns to increase jobs but, once in office, concentrated far more on social issues as opposed to the economy. Conservatives, who claim to oppose big government, showed their actual support for using government to impose their social and religious views upon others by increasing restrictions on abortion and access to birth control. NPR reported on a study which documented the increase in restrictions on abortion over the past three years:

While much national attention was focused on efforts to restrict abortion in Texas, a new study from the Guttmacher Institute reports that as many as 22 states enacted 70 provisions aimed at curbing access to abortion. That makes 2013 second only to 2011 in the number of abortion restrictions enacted in a single year, according to the think tank for reproductive rights.

To put the recent trend in some perspective: The 205 abortion restrictions enacted between 2011 and 2013 were more than the 189 enacted during the entire previous decade (2001 to 2010).

More than half of the restrictions passed in 2013 fell into one of four categories:

  • Regulations aimed at closing down abortion clinics by imposing restrictions that go beyond those required to protect patient safety. One such rule forces clinics to meet standards that were designed for hospitals or outpatient surgery centers that do more advanced techniques; another requires doctors who perform abortions to have hospital admitting privileges.
  • Limits on insurance coverage of abortion, particularly within the new health exchanges that have been set up to sell coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
  • Bans on abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
  • Limits on abortions that rely on pills rather than surgery.

The New York Times reported on how anti-abortion groups are encouraged by these new restrictions, while pro-choice groups hope this will alienate voters:

Advocates for abortion rights, taking heart from recent signs in Virginia and New Mexico that proposals for strong or intrusive controls may alienate voters, hope to help unseat some Republican governors this year as well as shore up the Democratic majority in the United States Senate.

Anti-abortion groups aim to consolidate their position in dozens of states and to push the Senate to support a proposal adopted by the Republican-controlled House for a nationwide ban on most abortions at 20 weeks after conception.

“I think we are at a potential turning point: Either access to abortion will be dramatically restricted in the coming year or perhaps the pushback will begin,” said Suzanne Goldberg, director of the Center for Gender and Sexuality Law at Columbia University.

The anti-abortion groups, for their part, feel emboldened by new tactics that they say have wide public appeal even as they push the edges of Supreme Court guidelines, including costly clinic regulations and bans on late abortions.

“I’m very encouraged,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “We’ve been gaining ground in recent years with laws that are a stronger challenge to Roe.”

“I think it is more difficult to get an abortion in the country today,” she said.

It is encouraging that there is more attention being paid to this trend and  hopefully we will really see a pushback to defend reproductive rights. Over the last few years we have seen dramatic increases in support for liberal positions on social issues ranging from marriage equality to ending prohibition of marijuana. Hopefully we will see the same with reproductive rights.

Please Share

2 Comments

  1. 1
    David Duff says:

    “pro-choice groups hope this will alienate voters”
     
    But obviously it didn’t as all those pesky Republicans were voted in!  “Heh, ‘The People’, don’cha wanna re-educate them all?!” as Lenin might have said!

  2. 2
    Ron Chusid says:

    It isn’t a matter of people intentionally voting in anti-abortion candidates. They were voted in during a wave election four years ago when Republicans took over many state governments due to people voting Republican thinking would help turn the economy around. Instead states taken over by Republicans often did worse than neighboring states which remained under Democratic control. In addition, when the Republicans took control they often concentrated on social issues rather than doing anything about the economy.

    Now that these Republicans elected four years ago are up for reelection, they could be thrown out of office,especially in blue states.

    In addition, attitudes have become more liberal on other social issues, which could also affect voter attitudes on reproductive rights. This is partially because younger voters are more liberal than older voters. On the other hand, we might not see as much impact from this because younger voters typically do not turn out in as well as older voters in off-year elections. A couple other factors also lead to Republicans winning more seats in Congress an state legislatures than the proportion of people who actually support them–gerrymandering of districts and the greater concentration of Democratic voters in urban areas (meaning they win a smaller number of seats by larger margins).

Leave a comment