The FBI has broken up a plot to blow up a bridge. Fox’s web site used this as an opportunity for a slur against Occupy Wall Street. The last line of their news story says:
It is unknown if the bridge incident was connected to Occupy Wall Street’s plans for nationwide protests Tuesday.
It is unknown only in the sense that there is no reason to connect Occupy Wall Street with an anarchist group planning a violent act. By the same logic it might be said that it is unknown if the bridge incident is related to anything planned by Fox, the Republican Party or any Tea Party group. However, Fox’s goal is to spread false narratives, such as that Barack Obama is a Muslim socialist and that Occupy Wall Street is a terrorist organization. Neither fair nor balanced. Certainly not true, but discrediting Occupy Wall Street is consistent with the conservative movement’s top priority of redistributing wealth to the ultra-wealthy.
Incidentally, while I wouldn’t try to confuse Fox with a terrorist organization, there is something both uncomplimentary and true which can be said about Rupert Murdoch today In the UK, members of Parliament are saying that Rupert Murdoch “is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company” and showed “willful blindness” to what was going on at News Corporation.
Returning to the bomb threat, MSNBC News did not mention Occupy Wall Street but the article does say:
The five were “controlled by an undercover FBI employee,” and agents had them under extensive surveillance for a long period of time.
On the one hand I have questions as to the degree to which the FBI is taking credit for, and utilizing resources for, stopping terrorist threats which might never have been meaningful without FBI involvement. On the other hand, publicity such as this might spread mistrust and paranoia among would-be terrorists, making them afraid to cooperate with others out of fear that they might be FBI undercover FBI agents.
Update: In light of the reports of violence at some of the demonstrations today, I would add that while I have sometimes been displeased with the tactics of Occupy Wall Street, there is no comparison between demonstrations (even those which do unfortunately become violent) and acts such as bombing a bridge. Occupy Cleveland canceled May Day protest plans following the news of the arrests to avoid “any implications in this nonsense.”
Unreal…“@RonChusid Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group #p2 #p21 #topprog http://t.co/2bIDqTia”
Unreal…“@RonChusid Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group #p2 #p21 #topprog http://t.co/2bIDqTia”
Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group – http://t.co/JpJm6uSI (via #sociablesite) http://t.co/JpJm6uSI
Vile ppl. VILE! RT @JPJABBER: Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group – http://t.co/1AlLOMwd (via #sociablesite)
RT @ronchusid: Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group #p2 #p21 #topprog http://t.co/6LS6ip8P
Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group – http://t.co/yx6hfGU6 (via #sociablesite) http://t.co/yx6hfGU6
Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group – http://t.co/CUmTdEqS (via @sociablesite)
Fox Tries To Connect Occupy Wall Street To Violent Anarchist Group – http://t.co/CUmTdEqS (via @sociablesite)
What going on here, occupy wall street admitted that 4 of the bomb plotters were part of there movement, what’s sad is the left can’t own up, you sad violence was coming from racist Tea Party members, never happened and now violence, distraction and bombing plots from occupy wall street, own up and get MSNBC to at least report the story which they are not!
Your account is rather twisted. (Did you get your misinformation from Fox?) These were people acting totally on their own because they felt the Occupy movement was not doing enough. The leadership (and other members) of the local Occupy movement had nothing to do with this and opposed their actions. From a more recent report: