Weiner: More A Case Of Stupidity Than A Major Scandal (So Far)

Anthony Weiner has admitted to sending the picture of his (covered) weiner over Twitter, and of similar behavior with other women he communicated with on line. As scandals go, Weiner’s is fairly small. As Steve Benen wrote:

On the Political Sex Scandal Richter Scale, I’m still not altogether sure why this even registers at all. Given what we know, Weiner shared adult content with women he met online. They were adults and the interactions were consensual. He didn’t commit adultery (Ensign), he didn’t hire prostitutes (Vitter, Spitzer), he didn’t solicit anyone in an airport bathroom (Craig), he didn’t pretend to be someone else in order to try to pick up women (Lee), he didn’t abandon his office for a rendezvous with his lover (Sanford), he didn’t leave his first two wives after they got sick (Gingrich), he didn’t have a child with his housekeeper (Schwarzenegger), there’s no sex tape (Edwards), and no interns were involved (Clinton). He’s not even a hypocrite — Weiner has never championed conservative “family values,” condemning others for their “moral failings.”

This assumes that there isn’t anything more to this. Nancy Pelosi has called for an ethics investigation of Weiner. Assuming that there are no minors and there are not more explicit pictures, my guess is that this is not a career ending scandal, but at very least will be a career stalling one. As can be seen in Steve’s list, the less severe sex scandals do not necessarily end careers, but I doubt he will be elected to a more competitive spot in New York anytime soon. (Elliot Spitzer might even beat him–time does seem to make these scandals less important to voters).

While Weiner’s transgressions appear to be relatively minor (at least so far), they were rather stupid. It is amazing how often we see similar patterns in politicians. Was whatever pleasure Weiner received from sexting with young women really worth all of this?  I would ask whether this will dissuade future politicians (which can be from either party) from doing anything so foolish, but the answer, based upon the past history of sex scandals in Washington, is clearly no.

Please Share

5 Comments

  1. 1
    Jim Z. says:

    Much will hinge on whether any of the correspondents were underage.

  2. 2
    Ron Chusid says:

    That would make matters much worse for him. If he is doing this with multiple women met on line there is also the danger that some were under age without his knowledge, which would still be damaging.

  3. 3
    John Sonntag says:

    RT @ronchusid: Weiner: More A Case Of Stupidity Than A Major Scandal (So Far) #p2 #p21 #topprog http://t.co/ikaeARW

  4. 4
    48657 says:

    Weiner: More A Case Of Stupidity Than A Major Scandal (So Far) http://bit.ly/ksz9AQ via http://outside.in/48657

  5. 5
    48657 says:

    Weiner: More A Case Of Stupidity Than A Major Scandal (So Far) http://bit.ly/ksz9AQ via http://outside.in/48657

3 Trackbacks

Leave a comment