We Are Not Alone

There’s been a lot of buzz about NASA’s planned announcement of a major astrobiological discovery on Thursday. Speculation has generally centered around something such as finding microscopic aquatic life on Mars or one of Saturn’s moons. Until we have the actual answer, I prefer to think bigger. Until NASA says otherwise, I’m going with an announcement that the Vulcans have arrived to make first contact. (I sure am happy we avoided Khan Noonien Singh and the eugenics wars of the 1990′s.)

Whatever happens on Thursday, The Truth Is Out There

Quote of the Day

“People lined up for days to see the new ‘Harry Potter’ movie. The movie is called ‘Harry Potter and the Long Line of Single People.’ It’s just nice seeing a long line these days where nobody is getting their junk touched.” –Conan O’Brien

SciFi Weekend: Interpreting Inception

Inception is coming out on DVD next week and I’m sure many are looking forward to the ability to rewatch crucial scenes without having to repeatedly pay for a movie ticket. This post contains major spoilers and is intended to discuss questions as to the meaning of the film for those who have already seen it at least once.

The most straight forward interpretation of Inception is of the story a con man, Dominic Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio), with one science fiction idea added. There is an ability to share and influence dreams, allowing the con man to extract information when the subject is sleeping and his defenses are down. There is an added twist here. Cobb’s dreams are repeatedly interrupted by his wife, Mal (Marion Cotillard), who does malevolent things. Late in the movie we learned that the two were trapped in limbo, a dream state so deep that the subjects do not realize they are dreaming and the normal kicks to awaken them no longer work. Cobb planted the idea in his wife’s mind that they were in a dream and they needed to kill themselves to get out. It worked, but Cobb had not yet understood the power of an idea. Even after awakening, Mal was obsessed by the idea that they were still in a dream. She both killed herself and set up Cobb to appear like the murderer, believing that being forced to be separated from their children would be enough to get Cobb to also commit suicide. Cobb, realizing he was in the real world and not a dream, instead fled the country.

The movie began with Dominic Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio), and Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) working to extract information from a powerful Japanese businessman, Saito. They used a dream within a dream to make the technique more effective at throwing the subject off guard. Saito was aware of what was happening and used this job sort of as an audition for Cobb to see if he was up to an even bigger job. Already we have multiple cases of deception, tipping off the viewer to be wary that things might not be as they appear.

Instead of a normal job of industrial espionage, Saito hired Cobb to convince  Robert Fischer, son of Saito’s terminally ill corporate rival, Maurice Fischer to break up his father’s empire. The question was raised whether inception, the planting of an idea in someone’s mind was possible. In return for accomplishing this, Saito said he had the power to get the charges against Cobb dropped in the United States, allowing him to return to his children. Cobb took the job, saying he knows it is possible as he did it once before. Later in the movie we learned the details I mentioned above on how he used inception on his wife.

Probably due to a sense of guilt over the death of his wife, and actions by Cobb to preserve his wife’s memories, a projection of Mal would invade Cobb’s dreams. Cobb would also see his children, but never see their faces in his memories or dreams.

Cobb needed an architect other than himself to devise the details of the dream world. If Cobb did this himself Mal (as a creation of his own brain) would also know the details, making it easier for her to destroy the dreams. Cobb recruited Ariadne (Ellen Page) to be the architect, explaining how he used dreams as he instructed her. Others were also recruited and a series of dreams within dreams going over three levels were used to progressively implant the idea in Fischer’s brain until it reached the point where he would embrace the idea of breaking up the company. One person stayed awake at each level to arrange for a kick to awaken those dreaming at a lower level.

The events in the real world took place on a plane as Fischer was flying back the United States upon the death of his father. The first dream level involved a van which eventually drove off a bridge and later hit the water–events needed as kicks to awaken the dreamers. The second dream level took place in a  hotel. There ceased to be gravity when the van was falling off the bridge in the layer above. It is not clear why the lack of gravity did not carry through to lower levels, but Christopher Nolan was free to make up the rules how much from one dream carried over to the next level. Due to being in a zero gravity state, it was necessary to have an explosion in an elevator be the kick which later awakened the dreamers. The final dream level used to perform inception on Fischer was the snow fortress, with an explosion destroying the fortress being the kick to awaken them. Ideas were planted in Fischer’s brain in each of the levels.

Due to the multiple layers and the sedatives used, those killed during the dream wound up in limbo instead of awakening.  Cobb went into the limbo state to rescue Fischer and Saito who had died during the events in other dream states. While there Mal tried to make Cobb question reality and we learned the full story of Mal’s death. We also found that a totem used by Cobb to determine if he was in the real world had initially belonged to Mal. The totem was a top which would pin forever in dream states which were not bound by the rules of physics, and only fall if Cobb was not dreaming.

Ultimately Cobb met Saito, who was now quite elderly due to the manner in which times moves exponentially faster in deeper levels of sleep. Now realizing he was in a dream, Saito reached for a gun, presumably to awaken himself from the dram and presumably Cobb did the same. We did not actually see either shoot themselves.

It next appeared that everyone was awakening from each level of the dream, ultimately with all awake on the plane in the real world. In the final sequence Cobb went  through the airport. He was met by his father (Michael Caine) and taken home. Throughout the movie there were images of Cobb’s children, but here he saw their faces for the first time. Cobb had already spun the top, but as his children were coming inside he did not watch to see if it would fall as he usually did. The top started to wobble but was still spinning as the screen went black.

Not seeing the top actually fall, along with not having seen Cobb or Saito actually kill themselves in limbo to cause them to awaken, left open questions as to whether Cobb was still in a dream state at the end. Perhaps Mal was right and Cobb was in a dream. If so, was he in a dream even when he thought he was awake as Mal had claimed, or did he start out in the real world and wind up stuck in limbo at the end?

Initially I was also suspicious about the final scene being real as the children kneeling while playing at the end looked remarkably like the children seen kneeling when Cobb imagined them several times during the movie. On first viewing I wondered if the children were exactly the same, never aging, with this being one more dream which they were in. I later found out that there was a subtle difference in their outfits and that two sets of children played the roles. The children were a couple years older in the final scene, even if not obvious upon viewing, making it more likely that the children at the end were not real and a repeat of earlier visions seen.

We seem to know for certain that Cobb began in the real world because early in the movie we saw Cobb spinning the top with a gun in his hand. He was ready to shoot himself to awaken himself if he found he was still in a dream, but the top did fall over. There could still be some question as to whether the top could be taken as proof he was in the real world, especially as it initially belonged to Mal.

There is other possible evidence that Cobb was in the real world both before the con and at the end. He was wearing a wedding ring during dream sequences but not in the real world scenes, including the conclusion. In addition, Michael Caine said in an interview that the token eventually did fall, and that all the scenes he was in were in the real world. However it is not certain if this is just his opinion or a definitive explanation.

The final scene can be viewed another way, ignoring the question of whether it was real or in a dream. For the first time Cobb did not wait to see if the token fell. Perhaps he was just interrupted by his children coming inside, or perhaps this was intended to mean he did not care. The phrase “Old man full of regret, waiting to die alone” was used repeatedly during the movie, with this phrase acting as a trigger phase to allow Saito and Cobb to remember there was a world outside of the limbo they were in. At the end, Cobb might have preferred the possibility of being in a dream world with his children as opposed to himself becoming an old man full of regret, waiting to die alone.

The story is far more straight forward if we assume that Cobb returned to the real world however there are many possible interpretations if the top did not fall. If Mal was right about them being in a dream and not the real world, was it just a projection of Mal or was it actually Mal herself invading Cobb’s dreams? Was Mal attempting to perform inception on Cobb? The ending might have been comparable to a common interpretation of the finale of The Soprano’s in which everything went black because Tony Soprano had been killed. In a similar fashion, the screen might have gone black because this dream which Cobb was in came to an end. In previous visions Cobb did not see his childrens’ faces. Perhaps seeing them here was the trigger to awaken Cobb.

Looking back at the film, the most likely explanation is that Cobb had awakened and was in the real world at the end. It is also clear that Christopher Nolan intentionally left ambiguity, especially by having the screen go black before the token fell. This led to increased discussion of his movie, and probably to increased ticket sales as many returned to attempt to find answers to these questions.

Quote of the Day

‎”On Glenn Beck’s radio show yesterday, Sarah Palin accidentally said, ‘We have to stand with our North Korean allies.’ Then Palin was like, ‘Wait. North Korea’s the one in the south, right?’” –Jimmy Fallon

Quote of the Day

‎”Sarah Palin has another new book. As long as somebody else is writing them for you, you can turn them out just like that.” –David Letterman

Rush Limbaugh’s Latest Conspiracy Theory: Obama To Take Control of Airline Industry

I was just out driving and scanning through the am stations, looking for the Wisconsin-Northwestern game. I wound up hearing Rush Limbaugh for a couple minutes. At first he was babbling about the TSA searches turning us into a police state, as if he wouldn’t be cheering them on if Bush was still in office.  Then Rush became more delusional.

He avoided outright making thisabsurd prediction himself but he clearly was pushing this attack line to see if it will stick. He spoke of how “people are saying” that this is all a prelude to the federal government taking over the airline industry. He went on to say it wouldn’t be surprising considering everything else which has happened.

This would only make sense to those sheep brainwashed by the right wing line that Obama is a socialist. Is Rush speaking of the auto industry, where Obama has placed General Motors on a path towards restoring itself as a private corporation? For a supposed socialist, Obama’s record so far has only been to keep the country out of a depression and strengthen capitalism.  Like other delusional right wing pundits, Limbaugh would prefer to stick to the false attack line which was decided upon before Obama even took office as opposed to paying any attention to Obama’s actual postions.

Conservatives Twisting Facts To Attack Health Care Reform

Many conservatives are linking to an article in The Washington Post on Medicare problems and falsely attributing the problems discussed in it to “Obamacare.” The fact is that the problems noted in the article are either problems beginning well before Obama took office and/or problems which Democrats have attempted to fix under health care reform.

The major problem cited is the sustainable growth formula. This was a formula devised by Congress in 1997 and the problems from it first were seen in 2001. The Democrats have tried several times since Obama took office to fix this, either as part of the health care reform legislation or in separate legislation. In each case the Republicans have acted to block these fixes.

Another problem noted is the disparity between payment for primary care physicians and specialists. The health care reform legislation takes some steps to reduce, although not eliminate, this problem.

Any claims that this article supports the critics of health care reform is not only false but actually demonstrates that health care reform did not go far enough. I bet that over the next several years we will see conservatives continue to blame any health care problems on Obamacare, regardless of whether the problems have anything to do with the actual health care reform legislation which has passed.

Quote of the Day

‎”Palin’s book just came out. It has just over 300 pages and just under 900 made-up words.” –Jimmy Fallon

Top Ten Questions to Ask Yourself Before Becoming a TSA Agent

David Letterman’s “Top Ten Questions to Ask Yourself Before Becoming a TSA Agent”

10. “Do I need a degree in groping?”
9. “Am I only doing this for the sweet TSA uniform?”
8. “If I find explosive underpants, may I keep them?”
7. “Will I enjoy being cursed at 40 hours a week for minimum wage?”
6. “If I find explosive underpants, may I keep them?” That was No. 8. Who checks these things anyway?
5. “Should I practice by frisking people on the street?”
4. “In five years, whose pants do I see my hands in?”
3. “Do I really want to know what a fat guy’s thighs feel like?”
2. “May I frisk myself?”
1. “What’s the closest airport to Shakira’s house?”

Thanksgiving With President Bartlet

George Bush Was Not Very Good At Making Decisions

The New Yorker looked at George Bush’s memoir Decision Points and found that The Decider was not actually very good at making decisions:

Here is a prediction: “Decision Points” will not endure. Its prose aims for tough-minded simplicity but keeps landing on simpleminded sententiousness. Though Bush credits no collaborator, his memoirs read as if they were written by an admiring sidekick who is familiar with every story Bush ever told but never got to know the President well enough to convey his inner life. Very few of its four hundred and ninety-three pages are not self-serving…

Every memoir is a tissue of omission and evasion; memoirs by public figures are especially unreliable. What’s remarkable about “Decision Points” is how frequently and casually it leaves out facts, large and small, whose absence draws more attention than their inclusion would have. In his account of the 2000 election, Bush neglects to mention that he lost the popular vote. He refers to the firing, in 2002, of his top economic adviser, Lawrence Lindsey, but not to the fact that it came immediately after Lindsey violated the Administration’s optimistic line by saying that the Iraq war could cost as much as two hundred billion dollars. In a brief recounting of one of the central scandals of his Presidency, the Administration’s outing of the intelligence officer Valerie Plame, Bush doesn’t acknowledge that two senior White House aides, Karl Rove and Lewis (Scooter) Libby, alerted half a dozen reporters to her identity…

The steady drip of these elisions and falsifications suggests a deeper necessity than the ordinary touch-ups of personal history. Bush has no tolerance for ambiguity; he can’t revere his father and, on occasion, want to defy him, or lose charge of his White House for a minute, or allow himself to wonder if Iraq might ultimately fail. The structure of “Decision Points,” with each chapter centered on a key issue—stem-cell research, interrogation and wiretapping, the invasion of Iraq, the fight against AIDS in Africa, the surge, the “freedom agenda,” the financial crisis—reveals the essential qualities of the Decider. There are hardly any decision points at all. The path to each decision is so short and irresistible, more like an electric pulse than like a weighing of options, that the reader is hard-pressed to explain what happened. Suddenly, it’s over, and there’s no looking back. The decision to go to war “was an accretion,” Richard Haass, the director of policy-planning at the State Department until the invasion of Iraq, told me. “A decision was not made—a decision happened, and you can’t say when or how.”

…Here is another feature of the non-decision: once his own belief became known to him, Bush immediately caricatured opposing views and impugned the motives of those who held them. If there was an honest and legitimate argument on the other side, then the President would have to defend his non-decision, taking it out of the redoubt of personal belief and into the messy empirical realm of contingency and uncertainty. So critics of his stem-cell ban are dismissed as scientists eager for more government cash, or advocacy groups looking to “raise large amounts of money,” or Democrats who saw “a political winner.”

…What he cannot explain is why he allowed Iraq to descend into a nightmare of violence, year after year, until, by 2006, millions of Iraqis were fleeing the country. Perhaps he didn’t know what was going on, having been shielded by sycophantic advisers and yes-sir generals. Yet “Decision Points”—indeed, the whole trajectory of Bush’s Presidency—suggests that he had the information but not the character to face it. “I waited over three years for a successful strategy,” he says in a chapter called “Surge.” But what sort of wartime leader—a term he likes to use—would “wait” for three years, rather than demand a better strategy and the heads of his failed advisers?

Posted in George Bush. Tags: . 1 Comment »

Palin Fights Barbara Bush While Her TV Show Loses Viewers

Sarah Palin has a habit of winding up in feud, and with his history of abuse of power it is a scary thought to think she might ever wind up as president with control of the FBI, IRS, and entire nuclear arsenal. She’s getting involved in a couple more.

Palin didn’t have the sense to ignore Barbara Bush’s suggestion that she remain in Alaska and instead launched into this counter-attack in an interview with Laura Ingraham:

“I don’t want to concede that we have to get used to this kind of thing, because i don’t think the majority of Americans want to put up with the blue-bloods — and i want to say it with all due respect because I love the Bushes — the blue bloods who want to pick and chose their winners instead of allowing competition,” Palin said (beginning at about 1:30 in the interview above).

Palin also suggested that the Bushes upper-class status had contributed to “the economic policies that were in place that got us into these economic woeful times.”

Meanwhile her television show is receiving criticism from animal rights groups while it falls in the ratings:

After setting a TLC ratings record last week, Sarah Palin’s reality show plummeted for its second episode.

Sarah Palin’s Alaska fell 40% on Sunday night to 3 million viewers.

Not many were in the key adult demo either. Only 885,000 viewers were ages 18-49, dropping 44% from last week.

In fact, the median age of the show is 57 — that’s 15 years older than TLC’s average.

There still were 3 million people who either were brain dead and thought she was worth watching or were brain dead and unable to figure out how to change the channel.

Educating Sarah Was Unsuccessful

During the 2008 campaign the McCain campaign found that Sarah Palin was ignorant of basic information regarding recent history and other nations, including that Korea was a divided country. Game Change explained:

She knew nothing. She had to be taken through World War I, World War II, the Cold War, and Palin was not aware there was a difference between North and South Korea. She continued to insist that Iraq was behind 9/11; and when her son was being sent off to Iraq, she couldn’t describe who we were fighting.

Palin is still having difficulty remembering the details about Korea. Today in an interview with Glenn Beck she referred to “our North Korean allies.”

“This speaks to a bigger picture here that certainly scares me in terms of our national security policy. But obviously we’ve gotta stand with our North Korean allies.”

In what might be the first occurrence ever, Glenn Beck provided the correct answer.

Majority Oppose GOP Repeal of Health Care Reform While Tea Party Opposes Benefits For Congress

The health care reform legislation caused a lot of problems for Democratic candidates this year due to all the misinformation about the plan spread by the right. It might also cause some problems for Republicans. If they stick with claiming to have a mandate to repeal health care reform Republicans risk objections from the majority of the country which wants to keep the current law or expand upon it. McClatchy reports:

The post-election survey showed that 51 percent of registered voters want to keep the law or change it to do more, while 44 percent want to change it to do less or repeal it altogether.

Driving support for the law: Voters by margins of 2-1 or greater want to keep some of its best-known benefits, such as barring insurers from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. One thing they don’t like: the mandate that everyone must buy insurance.

Making matters even more complicated for them, the newly elected Republican members of the House face demands from their base that they not only repeal health care reform but that they also decline government provided health care for members of Congress. Public Policy Polling reports:

Most Americans think incoming Congressmen who campaigned against the health care bill should put their money where their mouth is and decline government provided health care now that they’re in office. Only 33% think they should accept the health care they get for being a member of Congress while 53% think they should decline it and 15% have no opinion.

Democrats are actually the most supportive of anti-health care Congressmen taking their health care, with 40% saying they should accept it to 46% who think they should decline. But Republicans and independents- who put these folks in office in the first place- strongly think they should refuse their government provided health care. GOP voters hold that sentiment by a 58/28 margin and indys do 56/27.

This is an issue where Democrats really have the opportunity to create tension between the newly elected officials and the Tea Partiers who put them there by highlighting the disconnect between the freshmen Republicans’ rhetoric and their actions. Their base clearly expects them to act in a way consistent with their stated opposition to government provided health care but given Andy Harris’ recent outburst about his care not starting quickly enough it’s not clear the new electeds are getting the message. If Tea Party activists continue to get let down by the Republicans they elect it increases the possibility for them to shift their energies toward third party conservative candidacies in 2012.

Question of the Day

After the Republicans repeal health care reform, will they next repeal the Bill of Rights?