By: What theories can economics draw upon to evaluate Health care reforms? | Health Care

Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:07:06 +0000

[...] » Obama Campaigning For Health Care Reform Liberal Values [...]

By: Fritz

Fritz — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:22:00 +0000

People like the notion of “insurance”, which is why social security is still billed that way.

By: Ron Chusid

Ron Chusid — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:24:14 +0000

Obama’s use of the terminology “health insurance reform” doesn’t mean that Obama doesn’t get it. It is because of misleading information, such as that in your link, with nonsense like”If we go down the path of nationalized health care reform…” The change in terminology is to point out that this is not “nationalized health care” at all and that the major government intervention is to regulate insurance companies, not medical care.

The link also greatly exaggerates the impact of malpractice on health care costs.

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:15:52 +0000

“President Obama’s speech last week really moved me. Despite what my colleagues think of me. If what he says is what will EXACTLY happen, how can I not hope and work towards that cause”? Mike Oliphant runs a small Utah health insurance website http://www.benefitsmanager.net/SelectHealth.html and http://www.dentalinsuranceutah.net whom deals with hundreds of people on a day to day struggle to be approved for health insurance. “I get hopeful that I can finally tell people they can qualify for coverage REGARDLESS of their pre-existing medical condition”. Mike’s concern is that Obama’s people won’t deliver what he urges on areas within his speech. “I really have been moved by this guy and wish we could just talk so he could understand the frustration of a health insurance agent. I have been involved on a political level within the state of Utah and their struggle for health care reform. I have seen and regrettably been part of politics at work. I have learned lessons through baptism of fire with politics. For instance, I struggled against House Speaker Clark and H.B. 188 because that was what I was urged to do from our industry (that was all I knew). But after awhile and countless meetings with state and private carriers in Utah, I began asking myself if I was doing the right thing. I realized over time that House Speaker Clark really means what he says and is hard nose about getting reform done in Utah. I got that there wasn’t any behind the scene conspiracy scheme or personal objective of Mr. Clark. His bill makes allot of positive changes in the “health insurance reform” world of Utah. He claims that reform just doesn’t stop there, it must continue through “health care reform”. You see, there is a major difference between the two reforms. Clark “gets it” but I really worry that Obama’s administration doesn’t because if you have noticed the subtle language change of dropping “health care reform” and going to “health insurance reform”. See more about what Utah has accomplished here which utilizes private carrier involvement with true reform. If you can believe it, they reached it with an objective of $500,000. Perhaps the feds should take a look at Utah and House Speakers Clark’s bill 188. http://www.prweb.com/releases/.....614544.htm. Now I find myself on the “other side” of the fence furthering Utah’s cause. Let’s hope we don’t all have a mental breakdown nationally and just take a honest look at the proposals.

By: Sandra Day

Sandra Day — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:08:14 +0000

» Obama Campaigning For Health Care Reform Liberal Values http://bit.ly/5dqNj

[Original tweet, Topsy page]

By: symptomsunknown

symptomsunknown — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:08:14 +0000