[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVAgAJ9MD4o]
Here is the actual video of David Letterman’s apology to Sarah Palin and her family on last night’s show. Palin later accepted the apology. Unfortunately many Palin supporters have not accepted the apology and still plan protests against Letterman.
We also have the first pictures of the leaders of the anti-Letterman marches being held outside the Ed Sullivan Theater:
Update: Reuters reports on the anti-Letterman protests (emphasis mine):
Still, more than a dozen protesters held up banners outside Letterman’s Times Square studio as Tuesday’s show was being taped, but they were outnumbered by spectators and media.
Sounds like they are having trouble getting attention from anyone other than a handful of right wing kooks.
Update 2: The New York Daily News places the count at about fifty. MTV estimates three dozen. CNN says there were fifteen protesters.
Searching around the web I also found another comment worth quoting which I had missed in my earlier round ups. Kate Harding writes that Letterman and Palin are both jerks, but she felt compelled to defend Letterman (as I did) because he was the target of false accusations which went way beyond what he actually said. After summarizing what Letterman said and the distortions spread by Palin, Harding wrote:
She and her daughters do not deserve sexist attacks any more than Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem or your mom do, and she’s absolutely right that what Letterman said was out of line and indefensible. She’s absolutely right that jokes like that contribute to an oppressive culture for women and young girls. But on this rare occasion when she’s absolutely right about a couple of things, she can’t just stop there. She has to blow straight past reasonable outrage and into disingenuous, over-the-top accusations.
Earlier this week, a Palin spokesperson said in a statement, “It would be wise to keep Willow away from David Letterman.” When Lauer asked her about that, she said, “Hey, take it however you want to take it.” OK, here’s how I take it: You’re implying that Letterman’s a pedophile. Nice. See also: calling the jokes “sexually perverted,” which they weren’t, instead of “sexist and tasteless,” which they were. So now here I am, inspired to defend Letterman from spurious attacks on his character, when I should be reinforcing the accurate attacks on his character in response to his spurious and sexist attacks on yours and your oldest daughter’s. Why do you torment me so, Sarah Palin? Letterman said unequivocally offensive things, and he deserves to be condemned for them. But now, so have you, which complicates the matter of defending you as a fellow woman. Don’t get me wrong; I will always denounce anyone who calls you a slut, or any other misogynistic slur. You don’t deserve it, and that crap hurts all women. But if someone wants to call you a liar and a loon? You’re on your own, lady.