Palin Place: Will The Antichrist Be A Homosexual?

It has been a while since we’ve looked in on our favorite soap opera, Palin Place. Like any successful soap, our story has expanded beyond the original characters of the Palin family. We have already met Sarah, the young earth creationist.  This leads to the question of whether any other characters could make Wasilla look even more absurd than Sarah has. Enter our soap opera’s latest character, Ron Hamman, pastor for the Independent Baptist Church of Wasilla. Hannon cites the bible to warn that the Antichrist might be a homosexual:

Sodomy is the only sin for which God came down from heaven to destroy. Though God dealt with many other sins in various ways, there is no other for which he came down from heaven to verify and destroy. In the New Testament, sodomy is declared to be “against nature.” And of the men, Paul in Romans 1 says they leave “the natural use of the woman….”  In effect, there is no greater sin against God than to reject how he made you, and no greater sin against women than to reject how God made them.

But will the Antichrist be a homosexual? Having seen what the Bible says of sodomy, we have no further to look than the book of Daniel, chapter 11 to find our answer. It says, “Neither shall he [Antichrist] regard… the desire of women….” As I said at the onset, I am not the first to draw attention to this, but the verbiage is clear.

From a lost perspective, the reason sex sells, pornography is profitable, and prostitution is “the world’s oldest profession” is mankind’s desire of women. From Christianity’s position, it is part of the glue for the bond of marriage and the propagation of a godly heritage. But homosexuality does not regard this — in their unbridled lusts they burn for their own gender.

But consider this: The time is ripe for such a leader. Indeed, it should not be surprising that the one who is against everything Biblical and Christian should be a partaker of so great a sin; there is no greater way to reject the Creator than to reject your gender and his design for it. And at what other time have we seen such perversion come out of the closets onto our streets, threatening violence if we do not accept their ways?

Is it any wonder that Revelation 13 says that this same Antichrist will make war with the saints of the tribulation, and overcome them? Are they not now readying themselves to make it illegal to “offend” them in any way, calling it hatred to preach against their sin? Is it because they love us? The time is ripe for such a man.

But remember that sodomy is the one sin that God left heaven and came to earth to destroy. Could it be that this will be the predominate sin on earth when Christ descends from the clouds to fight against the armies of wickedness? And will it be just a coincidence that the Antichrist will be the very first occupant of the lake of fire, tasting eternal death 1,000 years before even the devil himself?

You be the judge.

Is that the religious right’s sign off to go along with Fox’s “We Report, You Decide?”  More importantly, what of those who judge differently from where Hannan is leading,  and do not see  the point in using the bible to support one’s personal prejudices? While these questions might not be asked in Palin Place, the attention which Sarah Palin has brought to Wasilla has led to far more comments (mostly negative) than Hannan could ever have received before.

With what we have seen of Wasilla, the methamphatemine capital of Alaska, it  is a shame that Wasilla is real and Cicely, Alaska is the fictitious city.

Be Sociable, Share!


  1. 1
    Infidel753 says:

    So, we’ll be able to recognize the Antichrist because he doesn’t “use women”?  Gotta love their terminology.

  2. 2
    Fritz says:

    The next pope is going to be Satan, so everything is on track.

    9. The Glory of the Olive. The Order of St. Benedict has said this Pope will come from their order. It is interesting that Jesus gave his apocalyptic prophecy about the end of time from the Mount of Olives. This Pope will reign during the beginning of the tribulation Jesus spoke of. The 111th prophesy is “Gloria Olivae” (The Glory of the Olive). The Order of Saint Benedict has claimed that this pope will come from their ranks. Saint Benedict himself prophesied that before the end of the world his Order, known also as the Olivetans, will triumphantly lead the Catholic Church in its fight against evil.

    10. PETER THE ROMAN – This final Pope will likely be Satan, taking the form of a man named Peter who will gain a worldwide allegiance and adoration. He will be the final antichrist which prophecy students have long foretold. If it were possible, even the very elect would be deceived. The 112th prophesy states: “In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Petrus Romanus, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations; after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people. The End.”

  3. 3
    Ron Chusid says:

    Does this mean that Wasilla will remain safe as long as they don’t pick a gay pope named Peter?

  4. 4
    Ellwood Autuori says:

    So, if I reject how God made me, it is a sin.  SO, God made me gay and God loves me SO I do not reject myself but glory in God’s wonderful creation.  When will people realize there will be many people in heaven beside Baptists from Palinville?

  5. 5
    Mike says:

    Ellwood- Speaking from what I would call a very “generic” Chistian point of view.  The Christian (and I claim to be one) believes the entire human race (from the free will actions of Adam and Eve onward) start in a state of rebellion from God. So when we are born, be that born straight or born gay, we are already naturally selfish, naturally greedy, and on and on. Before we even do anything wrong as an infant, we are in the enemy camp of evil.  God loves us even when we are still his enemy, and wants us to choose to join his side. Now, less generically speaking, I agree with you there will be all types in heaven, murderers , liars, theives. (even maybe a republican or two, but not likely 🙂 might be saved. )  After being saved, one’s life starts to change, usually not overnight, what you change into is up to God.

  6. 6
    Eclectic Radical says:

    It should be noted that, while the example shown of the Sodomites’ sin is their sadistic and selfish desire to rape the angels visiting Lot, the sin of Sodom is not explicitly identified. The city is described as ‘wicked’ but the wickedness is not explicitly defined. Most Jewish interpretations of what is, after all, a Jewish religious text do not identify homosexuality as the sin of Sodom. Rather the incident portrayed is interpreted as one example of a destructive and sadistic social value system at odds with righteous living. The notion that male homosexuality was the sin for which Sodom was destroyed was an extrapolation of the proto-Catholic Church of the Roman Empire, which identified male homosexuality with pagan religious practice. Nor is this interpretation universally accepted among Christians. A pastor whose opinions and interpretations I personally greatly respect once explained to me how, in his view, the story of the Sodomites is demonstrative of the greatest sin in mid-eastern culture: the violation of the mores of hospitality that governed bedouin social interaction with strangers.

    Two of my biggest pet peeves in life are the arrogance of right wing fundamentalists far removed from the spirit of religion pontificating on the letter of their religion as if only they knew the truth and the willingness of too many of my fellows on the left to accept the right wing argument that only they are truly representative of religion and so attack religion itself.

    The problem is not religion, which is intended to help us overcome our darker nature and find some way to socially interact with each other and the world (physical and metaphysical) but with human nature, which is destructive and self-obsessed and twists every idea and philosophy into justification for its own ‘sin.’

  7. 7
    Gregg says:

    The sin of Sodom is, actually, explicitely specified:

    “Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom; pride, fulness of bread, and prosperous ease was in her and in her daughters; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.”

    Eze 16:49-50

    And no, “abomination” isn’t gay sex either.

    So yes, in fact (wince) the Bible itself says that the Republicans are the more “Sodomite” party.

  8. 8
    RainbowLady63 says:

    Ron Hamman, pastor for the Independent Baptist Church of Wasilla, is a bare-faced liar.  He lied about the reason God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah and he lied about the Bible saying the anti-Christ wouldn’t have a desire for women.  Concerning the latter, he is referring to Daniel 11:37.  That verse and the one after it is talking strictly about gods/religion. It says he will have no regard for any god, including the god that womem desire.  If he’s actually that ignorant of what scripture means, then he doesn’t know enough to be a preacher.  But I think it’s more likely that,  being so full of hate for gay people, he just told it to suit himself and figured that most of his followers, as well as lots of other people wouldn’t know the difference.  Unfortunately, he’s right about that.

  9. 9
    Yaqub says:

    The argument for a gay Antichrist is very obscure, and relies on a passage of Scripture in Daniel 11:37 that is difficult to interpret.

    Guess what, the Muslims also have many prophecies of al-Mahdi (the Muslim leader to emerge to unite the Muslims and conduct jihad against the world, together with Isa – the Muslim version of Jesus – to institute Sharia over the world). The creepy that is that when compared against the Bible, we find them corresponding to the Antichrist and False Prophet respectively. see and

1 Trackbacks

Leave a comment