The Clinton Credibility Gap Widens

Hillary Clinton, who already has a serious credibility problem, has been caught telling yet another untrue story. The New York Times reports:

Over the last five weeks, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York has featured in her campaign stump speeches the story of a health care horror: an uninsured pregnant woman who lost her baby and died herself after being denied care by an Ohio hospital because she could not come up with a $100 fee.

The woman, Trina Bachtel, did die last August, two weeks after her baby boy was stillborn at O’Bleness Memorial Hospital in Athens, Ohio. But hospital administrators said Friday that Ms. Bachtel was under the care of an obstetrics practice affiliated with the hospital, that she was never refused treatment and that she was, in fact, insured.

“We implore the Clinton campaign to immediately desist from repeating this story,” said Rick Castrop, chief executive officer of the O’Bleness Health System.

Linda M. Weiss, a spokeswoman for the not-for-profit hospital, said the Clinton campaign had never contacted the hospital to check the accuracy of the story, which Mrs. Clinton had first heard from a Meigs County, Ohio, sheriff’s deputy in late February.

A Clinton spokesman, Mo Elleithee, said candidates would frequently retell stories relayed to them, vetting them when possible. “In this case, we did try but were not able to fully vet it,” Mr. Elleithee said. “If the hospital claims it did not happen that way, we respect that.”

This story furthers two problems for Clinton–both that she is running a poor campaign and that she cannot be trusted. Failing to vet the story is just another in the long list of errors made by a campaign which started out as being perceived as an invincible force. The number of errors made by her campaign raises questions as to her competence as a manager and of the type of administration she would run.

While many campaigns have been caught saying things which turn out to be untrue, few do so with the frequency of Hillary Clinton. This news will probably hurt her campaign coming so soon after she was exposed for falsely claiming she faced sniper fire in Bosnia. Clinton has also received criticism for the numerous lies she has told when campaigning, with some of them discussed in this video from Lawrence Lessig (with transcript also posted). Worst of all she has perpetuated the lies of the Bush administration in justifying the Iraq war based on the 9/11 attacks. She has continued  pandering to fear of terrorism while campaigning and in her recent ads.

Her husband’s administration is largely remembered for the lies told, including the claim that “I did not have sexual relations with that women.” Even before entering a general election campaign, Hillary Clinton has a serious problem with regards to dishonesty. If the media destroyed Al Gore with erroneous claims of dishonesty, imagine what they will do to Hillary Clinton, where there are many real examples, in a race against John McCain.

Be Sociable, Share!


  1. 1
    Jay McDonough says:

    from swimming freestyle:

    “…Senator Clinton, in voting to authorize the war, displayed a tragic recklessness. A more complete picture, in fact the “real” truth was available, and the Senator didn’t make the effort to seek it out. The logical question given the gravity and ramifications of that vote: Was it just carelessness or a willingness to select the data set that provided an advantageous political position?

    And so we come to Trina Brachtel, her baby boy, and O’Bleness Memorial Hospital. ”

  2. 2
    David says:

    Well stated and documented. No shilling or unnecessary hyperbole. An appropriate and reasoned conclusion based on evidence and history.

  3. 3
    Eric Dondero says:

    Funny, Liberal Values missed the biggest story of the day: Bob Barr announcing for President on the Libertarian ticket. When Ron Paul was running LV covered him every single day.

    But now that Libertarians like Barr and Wayne Root are the top LP candidates, there’s a Liberal Values news blackout.

    Bob Barr will make a fine Libertarian Party Presidential candidate, perhaps the best ever, even eclipsing Ed Clark’s high water mark of nearly 1 million votes (1.1%) in 1980.

    Problem is the Party is in the grips of leftwing Anti-War Libertarians (many outright Anarchists), thes days. Most of the Pro-Defense wing has left for the GOP into the Republican Liberty Caucus, Club for Growth, ect…

    Barr will get a substantial vote among just the hardcore Libertarian set – base of about 500,000.

    But if he hopes to increase that into the millions, he’ll need to walk a fine line on foreign policy, careful not to run away Pro-Defense libertarians who might be inclined to vote for him.

    Just today we learn of yet another report about to be released showing how the Surge in Iraq has been a stunning success since September.

    If Barr takes the Ron Paul non-interventionist/pacifist line and claims that the War is a “failure” he’ll end up looking foolish and run off a great many potential libertarian Republican supporters.

  4. 4
    Lex says:

    I think that it’s now safe to call the “gap” a chasm.

  5. 5
    Ron Chusid says:


    If you actually read before writing your nonsense you would see that there is a post on Barr possibly running for the LP nomination.

    The surge has been a failure. It temporarily reduced violence in some areas, as predicted by opponents of the surge, but it has not brought us any closer to having a stable Iraq.

1 Trackbacks

Leave a comment