Bush Hits New Low in CNN Poll

How many times have I had posts about Bush hitting a new low in the polls? It has happened again, this time with a new low of 31% approval in CNN’s poll. This is down forty points from its high at the start of the Iraq war five years ago, which is comparable to Lyndon Johnson’s drop of popularity because of Vietnam.

It is no surprise that Bush’s approval has dropped forty points after making one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history. What is surprising is that two out of the three viable major party candidates to replace Bush supported this policy. Being the only one who got it right, it is also surprising that Obama isn’t leading both Clinton and McCain by large margins.

Clinton Schedules Vague But Lead To Evidence of NAFTA Lie

Hillary Clinton released her schedules from when she was First Lady and we can be certain that journalists will be spending quite a lot of time digging through them. The records were quite vague, lacking specific information on the meetings. NBC News notes that the calendar entries are “full of unexplained private meetings on key dates when she and President Clinton were fending off a variety of scandals.”

The first item to embarrass Clinton shows she has not been honest when talking about NAFTA. Political Punch reports on a meeting regarding NAFTA in 1993 where Clinton expressed a much more favorable view on the treaty than she does today:

Two attendees of that closed-door briefing, neither of whom are affiliated with any campaign, describe that event for ABC News. It was a room full of women involved in international trade. David Gergen served as a sort of master of ceremonies as various women members of the Cabinet talked up NAFTA, which had yet to pass Congress.

“It wasn’t a drop-by it was organized around her participation,” said one attendee. “Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time. Folks were pleased that she came by. If this is a still a question about what Hillary’s position when she was First Lady, she was totally supportive if NAFTA.

That first attendee recalls that the First Lady’s office in the East Wing put together “the invitation list, who was invited authorizations and all that stuff.”

And what is this attendee’s response to Clinton today distancing herself from NAFTA? “For people who worked hard to pass NAFTA and who support the importance of markets opening for the economy in the long term, they’re very upset. A number of the women who were there are very upset. You need to have some integrity in your position. The Clintons when Bill Clinton was president took a moderate position on trade for Democrats. For her to repudiate that now seems pretty phony.”

Recalls a second attendee, “they were looking for women in international trade who supported NAFTA. Senator Clinton came by at the end. And of course she asked for our support and help in passing NAFTA.”

Women who attended that event, the second attendee says, have been incredulous to see Clinton distance herself from the trade agreement as she campaigns today. “They’re all saying, ‘What’s this all about?’ We all heard it firsthand.” She says Clinton isn’t being honest with voters today.

None of this is the least bit surprising considering Clinton standards for honesty and the manner in which they have no qualms about reversing themselves on any positions based upon what is most expedient politically.

ABC News  reviewed Clinton’s international trips and found they were “standard First Lady tourist fare” and which did not make her any more qualified to answer  a 3 a.m. phone call during a crisis.