Hillary Clinton has often claimed that she should be nominated because of her experience and she has often tried to paint Obama as being too inexperienced. This argument has hardly been very compelling considering how often Clinton has been wrong and Obama has been write, including on the Iraq war, on Cuba, on counter-terrorism strategy, and on diplomacy. Ben Smith reports that Hillary Clinton, despite her experience, has goofed again:
…in two confident television appearances, on CNN and ABC, Clinton made an elementary error about Pakistani politics: She described President Pervez Musharraf as a “candidate” who would be “on the ballot.”
In fact, Musharraf was reelected to the presidency in October. The upcoming elections are for parliament, and while Musharraf’s party will be facing off against opposition parties, the president himself is not a candidate.
“He will NOT be on the ballot,” said a Pakistan scholar at Columbia University, Philip Oldenburg, in an e-mail. “These are parliamentary elections, where the contests are for a seat in the national assembly.
The prime ministerial candidate typically fights for victory in a local constituency, as well as lead[ing] the party in a national campaign.”A spokesman for Clinton, Howard Wolfson, said Clinton was referring to Musharraf’s party, not the president himself.
And Oldenburg said that “how well the PML-Q, the so-called ‘King’s Party,’ does would in effect be a referendum on Musharraf.”
But Clinton’s words appear unambiguously to describe Musharraf himself as a candidate.
“If President Musharraf wishes to stand for election, then he should abide by the same rules that every other candidate will have to follow,” she told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer (.pdf) Dec. 28.
“He could be the only person on the ballot. I don’t think that’s a real election,” she told ABC’s George Stephanopolous December 30.