[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzrUD-5hf1A]
In September I posted the video of Bill Maher’s new rule which was on 9/11 conspiracy theorists:
New Rule: Crazy people who still think the government brought down the Twin Towers in a controlled explosion have to stop pretending that I’m the one that’s being naïve. How big a lunatic do you have to be to watch two giant airliners packed with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV igniting a massive inferno that burned for two hours and then think, “Well, if you believe that was the cause?” Stop asking me to raise this ridiculous topic on this show and start asking your doctor if Paxil is right for you.
Firday’s show had some 9/11 conspiracy theorists heckling Maher from the audience, as seen in the video above.
Maher shows less sense in choosing political candidates than he does in disbelieving the 9/11 conspiracy theorists. His interview with John (I’ll say anything to get elected) Edwards was consistent with other impressions Maher has given that Edwards is his preferred candidate. For the most part Maher asked a lot of soft ball questions, but he did at least get one cut in on Edwards for his heavy promotion of ethanol in his energy plan. Suggesting that Edwards’ energy plan was written to pick up votes in Iowa, Maher asked “Why do I think if we had the first primary in Vermont we would be subsidizing biofuels made out of syrup.”
Maybe he thinks that as Edwards’ entire campaign, and changes in his positions from 2004, all seem to be based upon picking up votes in Iowa. That legal training to support either side of an argument in court has sure paid off.