<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Path to 9/11&#8243; Criticized by Film Critics, Historians, and Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/</link>
	<description>Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=262#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Completely true? I think that even most people who generally agree with Michael Moore realize he stretches the truth at times. Still, F 911 was far closer to the truth than The Path to 9/11, with its inacuracies discussed in several posts here.

At least in the case of a Michael Moore documentary, everyone knows his biases. Moore&#039;s documentaries  are not aired first run on network television, and they are not billed as being based upon a government report (as Path to 9/11 initially was). The Path to 9/11 was potentially far more dangerous in its distortions of the truth--especially with groups like Scholastic planning to use it as teaching material until they found out how biased it is.

There is no question as to the fact that The Path to 9/11 is inaccurate. Not only have we quoted many people here regarding its inaccuracies, ABC even agreed to remove some of the most inaccurate scenes and to add disclaimers as to its accuracy. They also removed the claims that it was based upon the 9/11 Commission report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely true? I think that even most people who generally agree with Michael Moore realize he stretches the truth at times. Still, F 911 was far closer to the truth than The Path to 9/11, with its inacuracies discussed in several posts here.</p>
<p>At least in the case of a Michael Moore documentary, everyone knows his biases. Moore&#8217;s documentaries  are not aired first run on network television, and they are not billed as being based upon a government report (as Path to 9/11 initially was). The Path to 9/11 was potentially far more dangerous in its distortions of the truth&#8211;especially with groups like Scholastic planning to use it as teaching material until they found out how biased it is.</p>
<p>There is no question as to the fact that The Path to 9/11 is inaccurate. Not only have we quoted many people here regarding its inaccuracies, ABC even agreed to remove some of the most inaccurate scenes and to add disclaimers as to its accuracy. They also removed the claims that it was based upon the 9/11 Commission report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Brito</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Brito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=262#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>all of you who are questioning the accuracy of this movie are probably the same ones who believe that Faranheit 911 is completely true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all of you who are questioning the accuracy of this movie are probably the same ones who believe that Faranheit 911 is completely true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired FBI Agents Question Accuracy of &#8220;The Path to 9/11&#8243; - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired FBI Agents Question Accuracy of &#8220;The Path to 9/11&#8243; - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=262#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>[...] “The Path to 9/11″ Criticized by Film Critics, Historians, and Others [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “The Path to 9/11″ Criticized by Film Critics, Historians, and Others [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalhomo</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalhomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=262#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with calling people out when they lie.  The notion that it is perfectly OK to lie is a cancer on our political culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with calling people out when they lie.  The notion that it is perfectly OK to lie is a cancer on our political culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/09/08/the-path-to-911-criticized-by-film-critics-historians-and-others/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=262#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>The politicians lie and put their spin on events. Surely you don&#039;t doubt it. Why shouldn&#039;t anybody else be allowed the same leeway? Why would you believe the official version anymore than a crackhead&#039;s denials? We live in the age of b. s... Deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The politicians lie and put their spin on events. Surely you don&#8217;t doubt it. Why shouldn&#8217;t anybody else be allowed the same leeway? Why would you believe the official version anymore than a crackhead&#8217;s denials? We live in the age of b. s&#8230; Deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.159 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-22 14:31:38 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
