The New York Times reports that Ohio is going to delay destruction of the Presidential ballots. Critics of the Ohio election are suing to delay the destruction for several additional months alleging widespread irregularities:
“This is not about Mr. Kerry or Mr. Bush or who should be president,’’ said Bill Goodman, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a New York group that is part of the lawsuit. “This is about figuring out what is not working in our election system and ensuring that every cast vote counts.
“There is a gap between the numbers provided in the local level records, which until recently no one has been allowed to see, and the official final tallies that were publicly released after this election, and we want to figure out why that gap is there.”
Blackwell’s candidacy for Governor wil likely increase the attention given to the criticism of how he handled the 2004 election and will hopefully lead to an end of the system where partisan individuals are in charge of elections. This was a problem both in Ohio in 2004 and under Katherine Harris in Florida in 2000.
My bet is that a full review will show even more signs of shoddy handling of ballots, and possibly sporadic cases of outright fraud. The January 2005 report from the Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee found “massive and unprecedented voter irregularities and anomalies.” Most likely a full review will not change the conclusion that these irregularities “would not have erased Bush’s 118,000 vote margin in the state.” However it is preferable to determine this by evaluation of the data rather than by speculation. Even if the number of votes changed by such irregularities is not sufficient to change the result inn 2004 the system should be corrected before future elections.
Reviews subsequent to the 2000 election, which was officially much closer than in 2004, did show that Al Gore would have won Florida if there was either a recount of the entire state (as opposed to the specific counties requested by Gore) or if the overcount was considered in cases where the voter’s choice was clear. The overcount consisted of ballots where Gore’s name was both punched and Gore’s name was also written in, leading to disqualification of the ballot for voting twice.